Showing posts with label canaletto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canaletto. Show all posts

Monday, 6 February 2023

2023 Paris

4.2.23

Sitting in the Bastille Opera, watching Tristan und Isolde – on a TV screen…  We got here early, at just after 6pm, since the performance was starting at 7pm.  Except it wasn’t – it started at the crazy time of 6pm.  And they weren’t letting in anyone until the interval…

I seem cursed with Tristan: the first (and only) time I saw it at the Royal Opera House, Jon Vickers was Tristan.  Brilliant...except that before the start of the 3rd act, he decided he had a sore throat, and wasn’t going to sing any further.  One man in the audience cried out “money back” after the announcement, and before we went straight to the Liebestod, with a stand-in (lie-in) sprawled on the ground as Isolde sang over him.

Tonight’s performance was the main reason for this quick visit to Paris, but fortunately we’ve done much else besides.  Arriving with the super-convenient Eurostar – one of my favourite ways to travel – Thursday afternoon, we walked around the Bastille area, where our rented flat was located.  I don’t know this part too well, so it was good to see this different slice of Paris.  Lots of fine sandstone buildings, broad boulevards with high apartments on either side – often six storeys high.

On Friday, to the Musée national des arts asiatiques Guimet.  Shockingly, this is the first time I’d been here.  Clearly, a really fine collection, with some masterpieces from various Asian cultures.  But a bit of a labyrinth – I found it hard to create any kind of thread moving through it.  We’d come partly for the special exhibition of Afghan art.  Which turned out to be fabrics.  Nice enough, but nothing special.  Some of the videos in the exhibition were – because of the stunning landscapes of Band-e-Amir (I think, searching for them afterwards online), used as backgrounds.  This was reinforced when, on the way out, we discovered another Afghan exhibition – about French archaeological excavations there.  Again, some stunning pix of glinting azure tiles and towers, including the amazing Minaret of Jam.  Pity that it’s unlikely I’ll ever get to see them first-hand.

In the afternoon, to the Musée de Cluny. Another one that I’d somehow failed to visit before.  To be fair, this was closed for restoration the times I did try.  Ultimately, I found the relentless medieval art a little oppressive and – dare I say it? - boring.  Some stuff not bad, but really so circumscribed in its range.

In the evening, a meal with friends in a Peruvian restaurant near Bastille.  Interesting flavours, but painfully small portions – and hideously expensive.  The sum involved was particularly obscene because nearby our flat there is a homeless bloke that we have to pass every day.  The contrast between the meal and the man was painful.

Today, to Place des Vosges, and Victor Hugo’s house.  Or rather a reconstruction of it.  Place des Vosges has always been one of my favourite spots in the city – so balanced, civilised, so French.  Hugo’s house had plenty of good stuff.  I was struck by a painting of Hugo and his son.  Particularly the tight grip that Hugo had of his son, as if preventing him from fleeing.  Very weird, disturbing.

The along to Musée Cognacq-Jay, concentrating on art of the eighteenth century – lot of young ladies with fashionable grey hair, and carelessly-exposed bosoms.  Soft porn for aristocrats.  Best pix were two Canalettos, one that I didn’t recognise, of the canal of Santa Chiara, with unusual blind brick walls – not something you see much of in Venice.

Then later to here, where I now sit watching a rather static production of Tristan und Isolde – the singers sitting on a bench, while above them are projected “relevant” images – of a stormy sea that could be Cornwall, and also a man and a woman – Tristan and Isolde, I presume – taking their clothes off – all of them.  Afterwards, lots of water splashing around, so I supposed this was some kind of ritual cleansing.  As far as I can tell from the tinny sound of the TV, tonight's singers are quite good.  I’ll be interested to hear them in the flesh when they deign to let us in…

Despite this little mishap, it’s always good to be back in Paris – and it’s very much “back.  It’s the only city that feels the equivalent of London – like some parallel world instantiation – different in details, but the same overall.  Been using the metro extensively – so much cheaper than the Tube, and more convenient in that the stations are closer together.  But it is, I have to concede, dirtier and stinkier than London’s…  Lots of cyclists here thanks to the Green mayor, Anne Hidalgo.  French drivers still bonkers.

I have noticed – too late – that there an exhibition of Uzbek art at the Louvre, but I don’t think we’ll be able to fit it in before we go back tomorrow.  Still, saw plenty last year.  I hope that I make it back to the region in the summer as planned.  I’m a bit concerned that we have learned nothing from Covid, and are about to go through a bird flu pandemic – it already seems to be jumping between species, and yet it isn’t even on governments’ radar.  We shall see…

5.2.23 

This Eurostar lounge in 
Gare du Nord always feels like a bridgehead of the UK – probably because it only goes to London, and thus, in some sense, is already part of it...

A gentle morning with friends in the 19th, including a walk around Parc des Buttes-Chaumont.  Unusual because of its extremely steep gradients – and because it is completely artificial, built in a stone quarry (hence the gradients).  Reminds me that this is one big difference with London, which has hundreds of parks, big and small, whereas Paris has far fewer in the centre.  

Last night was, well, interesting.  After waiting an hour and a half in the bar area, we were allowed in, for Act II of the opera.  Which basically consists of Tristan and Isolde saying “I love you” for an hour, followed by King Mark saying “I’m really sad you betrayed me” to Tristan, followed by ten seconds of Tristan running on to Melot’s sword (bizarrely, a couple of outstretched fingers in this production…).

After the second interval, I finally heard Act III of Tristan und Isolde live – undoubtedly my favourite bit.  The opening chords, deep in the bass – Bb minor, with an added G resolving upwards – followed by violins climbing up and up into the musical stratosphere – get me every time.  But hearing it live is something else: no hi-fi can quite capture the low graininess of the opening chord on the strings, or the soaring, glittering ascent of the violins.

After that, the wonderfully plangent cor anglais – always makes me think of Sibelius’ “Swan of Tuonela”, doubtless inspired by Tristan and the sounds of Act III's opening.  Then we have Tristan dying for an hour, followed by the big tune – “Mild und leise” in which Isolde dies slightly more quickly.  The staging again very static, the projected images again involving lots of water, culminating in a reasonable transfiguration and ascension with the upward stream of drops.  The end – audience goes mad in the annoying way they do.  We leave.  To be fair, the voices were pretty good – especially Isolde and Kurwenal.  Tristan was good too, but the effect rather spoilt by his bantam-like body – all belly and no legs – which was embarrassing when supine, which he was for most of Act III.

But opera is such a crazy experience anyway – and Wagner even more so.  Thousands of people sit almost motionless for four hours, watching this improbable Tristan and slightly more probable Isolde, singing this lush version of an old tale.  In many way, this incredible coming-together – of ancient Celtic, romantic German and contemporary Parisian – was the most touching aspect of the evening.  It underlined to me why the Musée Guimet and the Musée de Cluny had left me cold: they lacked this incredible complexity and richness.  Similarly, the Canalettos in the Musée Cognacq-Jay spoke to me because they were Venice and “Walks with Lorenzetti” and all that these imply and touch on for my life.

This Paris trip – perhaps my tenth – re-affirms how important the central points of European culture are for me, and how familiar they feel when I encounter them.  And for that I am grateful…


Saturday, 29 October 2022

1991 Berlin

30.8.91 Gatwick airport

I was here on Monday; and less than two weeks ago.  Life is so...hectic; interesting.  I can barely keep up with myself.  Work is crazy – editor of PC Magazine, Personal Computer Directory launching, publisher of Windows User, Electrical Retail Trade and (until today) Electronics Weekly.  Freelance stuff for the Daily Telegraph had to be done this week.  The novel barely touched for months…

Well, I sit now in the café of the main museum at Dahlem. Amazingly, outside, in the entrance hall, there is still (still? - the same one?) an exhibition of musics from the ethnomusic collection.  And one of them is Balinese.  So I came here to complete that cycle.  Alas, not symbolic, I hope, the headphones had been removed.

A strange day so far, but not unpleasantly.  Due largely no doubt to its sheer speciousness – there was no real reason why I shouldn't have come on Sunday – except that I wanted to see a little of the new Berlin.  So a little work this afternoon – more problems – but hey.  Then out to Dahlem.  Always so strange going back after all those years.  Too soon and things are spoilt, but leave a decent decade, as the memories begin to fade or simply get slightly mislaid, and the re-visit has a real charm.

So I recognised the museum and some of the pix.  And as for the Balinese and Sumatran musics…  Some new discoveries – the Burgundian stuff, Weyden, Campin, two great Canalettos – a pair of night scenes, one of which I saw in New York, probably on the day the Berlin Wall came down...ah, the connections, how I luv 'em…  But given the limited time, my main advance today was the Central American collection.  

Well, it had to be.  Having found an Afghan restaurant recommended by one of the guide books (Cadogan, which really seem to be taking off – some are quite good – lovely typeface too), Katschikol, Pestalozzi 84, I had to go.  Suitably Afghani cimbalom in the background, very full menu – better than Caravanserai in London by Paddington.  

Long walk here through mainly residential areas [Dooch turns out to be cool, milky, with cucumber and herbs – lovely for this weather.  Wow – vorspeise Torschi very hot – gherkins and fruits in vinegar and chili etc. - yow.]  I find it hard to get a feel for Berlin.  It is undeniably busy, but looking through the inimitably named "Zitty"(City Limits here) I'm not impressed by what's available.  The contrast with somewhere like Paris is painfully clear: there I felt immediately that this was a bustling city I could live in.  Here… [Main course badenjan, bonani, tschalau.  Dessert – falooda, plus Afghan tea – scented, quite strong.  Heavy but pleasant meal.]

31.8.91 Outside the Pergamon Museum

Strange to be back here.  It is all so different – just walking in – and yet the same – the wrecked or decaying buildings, the strange absence of something – liveliness? Museum not yet open.

On the way back last night, I walked along the Ku'damm.  Very like Champs-Élysées.  Interesting the prostitutes out – in regulation gear of body-hugging pants.  Many quite attractive – and young.  But what a life – what prospects.  Odd little Trabis everywhere – along with the huge, squat-brutalist architecture – damning evidence that architecture reflects the soul of a nation.

Sun very pleasant now.  Along to Alexanderplatz.  Amazing – a kind of grey Milton Keynes, now suddenly gone very tacky.  Poor Döblin.  To Moskau restaurant – very quiet, very civilised – fish soup (Baikal) followed by Uzbek plov (whatever plov is).  Opposite, across the eight-lane road, a cinema is showing Lawrence of Arabia… Behind looms the Hotel Berolina.  The air-conditioning whines.  The food – and general ambience of the place, with shapes and objects all slightly foreign – reminds me strongly of Moscow – not surprisingly.  The same is also true of East Berlin generally so far.  Strange to be here again after so many years.  Impressive main course – served in a hollowed-out cabbage, with lamb, peppers, mushrooms, rice, cream – huge and good.  Good value too – about £6.

Back to  Alexanderplatz, where I have to stop to read Döblin...but now how things have changed.  The U-bahn number 2 to below Unter den Linden, which I walk along.  The Oper, rather fine, a good square with crazy Pantheon-like church (hallo, Peter Greenaway).   Unter den Linden busy – I can almost imagine it as the centre.  To the Brandenburg Gate, now looking rather sordid with the Imbiss stands everywhere – the obligatory lumps of "wall" being sold.

S-bahn not open here, so I walk through the Tiergarten to the Neue Nationalgalerie – lovely cool woods – where I sit again now.  I vaguely remember the Neue Nationalgalerie – a huge bright slab – of nothing – typical van der Rohe.  The galleries are below.  It all works pretty well.  Lots of good stuff, but I am particularly struck by the integrity (sic) of the Lovis Corinth.  I must find out more.

1.9.91 Kleist's Memorial, Wannsee

I think I must be getting into necrophilia or something: first Proust's grave, now here.  So morose these krauts...but what a wielder of the German language. 

2.9.91

I'm getting behind, as ever.  Yesterday after Kleist to the 
Schloss Charlottenberg.  Rather rushed alas – I was meeting someone for business at 1pm.  So along to the Galerie der Romantik – for the Caspar David Friedrich – wunnerful.  Then outside to admire the facade – and enjoying the sun (too much, I fear).

Lunch um die Ecke of our street and Ku'damm.  Not much good – and lousy service.  Then into the former East Berlin on U-5 to Friedrichstrasse.  To the Brandenburger Tor along Unter den Linden for coffee and cakes in the café by the Oper – very nice, waiters with strange accents.  Very civilised.  Then back to the hotel for a shower and a rest.

Afterwards, we went looking for "Istanbul" – a Turkish restaurant, not surprisingly.  Closed for repairs.  Wandered around and found a Greek dive (ha!).  Eat there – with various fun trying to get what we wanted.  Had fun also trying out a list of Greek.  Walking back past the deceptively attractive prostitutes on Ku'damm.

Today, along to the Funkausstellung – not as bad as I expected, but bad enough.  Lunch up in the Funkturm restaurant – very nice.  Lovely view, cool and good food.  Then walk to here – after buying a ticket for the Israel Philharmonic tomorrow – an open air concert.

3.9.91 Waldbühne

Where I sit now, in a huge natural amphitheatre, to the west of the Olympic Stadium.  The sun has just set, casting a slight orange glow to my left; the sky, blissfully, is utterly clear.  The day much the same as yesterday: long, hot and sweaty, lunch up in the tower again – very nice – could get used to it.  Back to the hotel, quick eats, then out to here.  One bit of nonsense: I follow everyone out of the U-bahn, after buying my ticket for the return – and throwing away the old one.  But following everyone, I find buses to take us the rest of the way: will I be done for travelling without a ticket?  No, in fact…  Good few thousand around, eating, drinking, smoking.  We were given small candles as we came in...could be good.

The concert about to begin.  As the light changes, so does the aspect.  I see now the candles already lit being used by people for their supper – especially where they have a ledge for cloth and appurtenances.  Nice.  Pity about the smokers...

As I suspected, this place becomes more magical as night descends.  Sunset turned into a peach blur, the podium gradually stood out, and then the candles were lit.  Hundreds – thousands soon – of points of light, wonderful ancient symbols.  I shall light mine now...

More destinations:

Sunday, 7 November 2021

1993 Prague

3.11.93

Grey, misty, cold...perfect.

Airport very efficient, the coach outside less modern looking.  On the bus Kr.20 each – about 50p.  Tickets that poor quality pink paper I remember from East Germany and Russia.

The Czech language looks as if the vowels have been crushed out of it – perhaps by the imperialists and oppressors.  Or to create a dense, secret language only Czechs can speak…  On the radio, Spandau Ballet...rediscovered?  Preserved in a time warp?  After changing our room (327 to 209), we now have a spacious double with hot and cold running trams outside…  Very atmospheric ting-a-ling of the bells.  I think we may have been stung with the taxi – and with a meter: Kr.220 – compare Kr.20 for the bus from the airport. 

For some reason, I feel as if I am in Poland.

Dinner in the café here – very cheap (Kr.270), not very good.  Strange: the waitress was dressed in a very short skirt.  Fine legs, but the faces she would pull if you dared to ask her for anything.  A sodium light outside the window goes on and off randomly… On TV, three channels in Czech, CNN, Eurosport etc. (saw my first Indy car racing – can see why it is likely to take over.  Impressed by young Mansell, who clearly has something….)

The light and the trams are like some intense East European film...full of brooding intensity.  The hotel is large and labyrinthine.  Probably 60s originally, through modernised recently.  At dinner, my Czech pronunciation of dishes provokes torrents of near-inappropriate words.  But German seems to be the second language.

4.11.93

The Old Town Square – having bought a Kr.100 five-day ticket for the metro/trams.  Up from Wenceslaus Square to here.  Town Hall – fine doors – carved dogs' heads.  This place really does lack Mozart…   To Charles Bridge – very atmospheric in the mist.  River reminds me of Bath… Up to Prague Castle (stopping off for a glühwein).  Amazingly massy city – full of huge buildings piled together.  And buildings are big here.  Passed Italian Embassy.  The statues on the bridge, in perspective and the mist.  Black…  Autumnal colours everywhere – matching the Baroque oranges and browns.  To the information office – so many concerts – Prague really is a city of music.

Amazing how little English is spoken – in the metro, none, elsewhere some German.  Great.  Now in Staropražská Rychta – cheap, but seems quite good – despite the synth playing bouncy tunes in the background.  We have two tickets for The Magic Flute (in Czech) at Mozart's opera house tonight – Kr.240 – for two.

Visited St Vitus Cathedral – very English in design, but lacking the monumentality, spirituality.  Few tourists around – only schoolkids, really.  Then caught tram #22 direct to the centre – great views, especially from the bridge.  

Various pork obscenities – especially two great fat wobbing phallic sausages – one a blood sausage.  But after the article in Der Spiegel I really feel very unhappy about eating meat… Heavy but nice plum dumplings/pancakes after.  Pity about the music – the music of hell in its triviality – imagine condemned to an eternity of it…  
2 o'clock, restaurant quiet now – probably because offices were busy at 7.30am this morning.

In Mozart's opera house – for Die Zauberflöte – appropriately…  Glorious eggshell blue and gilt here, quite deep the horseshoe – we are on fourth level, there is also a fifth… Pompeian ceiling.  Curtain "up" – and it was already up.  Good programme – in English and German.  "Modern" production – Pamina emerges from the audience.  Papageno – Kabuki, Monostatos – Miles Davis in a samurai outfit.  Sarastro is… Head of a Freemason lodge.  Acoustic tremendous – perfectly audible up here.  Band small – just three double-basses – but loud enough.  Unusual disposition of band – strings to one side, wind and brass to the other.  But just who as the Jesus figures playing the flute?  Great value, though.

Bought "The Prague Post" – US, of course, but interesting glimpses.

5.11.93  

Tram #9 and 22 to Prague Castle.  The room of the defenestration.  Fine green-glazed oven – still warm...with history?  Darkness falling at 3.15pm.  Wencelaus Hall – amazing columns – they seem to move away as you pass.  Beautiful wooden door to the north.  Up the stairs then to a room full of coats of arms – whose…?  A room with a cabinet of fat books – blue, green, flowers.  The chapel, smelling of wood and cold and history.  Everything has a real presence in this place, as if so much that has happened here has soaked in to this spot.  Small organ with gilt cockle shells.  I am being photographed, background a misty, cold Prague.  A Union Jack flutters below us.  To St George's Basilica – wonderful pure Romanesque inside with half-raised altar.  Beautiful subdued crypt – six columns, low.  Interesting to note that even here, in the ticket office, a PC (DOS).

Then to the Golden Lane – pity about the bloody graffiti on the walls – this sad urge.  (Heard a snippet of Dvořák's Requiem – never knew it existed – sounds good.  Also very good prices on Czech CDs….)  Overall the castle has grown on me considerably.  It has real character: rather melancholy, what with its defenestrations, but rather touching.  Tram #1 direct to hotel.  I do like trams (especially since they're included in the Kr.100 five-day pass – wonderful).  Ate in the hotel: Kr.240 for filling (pork) food.  Good soup: milk and potatoes, onions and egg.  Plenty of slivovice.

Wandering through the back streets from Charles Bridge to the National Theatre (we have tickets to The Makropulos Affair on Sunday – and ecco another good reason for learning Czech, old Janáček boyo…).  So much in a state of ruin: I had worried that everything would be plastic and capitalist, but too much remains to be done – it'll be a decade before everything is finished.  Went to ask about private rooms: Kr.1200 for a double in the centre – about what we're paying, Kr.800 outside.

Metro very Stalinist – very deep, abstract design on walls – and no litter (yet).  Trains frequent (there is a countdown clock) and fast.  As are some escalators – presumably to cover the great depth.  And yet here too the handrails travel faster than the feet: why?  Is this the Fourth Law of Thermodynamics?  National Theatre a sooty black monster; next to it a modern horror, bug-eyed like Argos.

Queued in butcher's to buy water – very orderly – and a very sweet young lady behind the counter – Slav blonde, not too spoilt by Czech health system.  Streets very animated in the dusk, light rain falling.  Very lived-in feel, the trams thundering past like dinosaurs.  And German, German everywhere.  And Mozart.  In this week there is Die Zauberflöte (twice), Così fan tutte, Die Entführung aus dem Serail, and marionette versions of Don Giovanni, plus free interpretation of Die Zauberflöte, Don Giovanni and Figaro.  And more Requiems than you could shake a stick at.  Vienna/Salzburg, eat your heart out.

6.11.93

To Mozart's house yesterday – closed and daunting, a plaque on the wall.  One day this'll be a tourist mecca.  To Wenceslas Square.  Raining, progressively harder.  A comedy of trams (fine title…) - trying to get to St Agnes, take #5 in wrong direction.  End up past Mozart's lodging near the Old Town, finally find somewhere with 
glühwein.  I like the rain.  Bar looks like the crypt of a church, but has a large Art Nouveau thing in the middle.

In Lidový dům = "Mozart Brasserie" [catchphrase: "walk in, dance out…"?]  We ate downstairs in the restaurant in the north-east corner of Old Town Square, then spent £50 on 10 CDs – old classical, Suk, Dvořák, Janáček, Martinů – about £5 each, some £3.  Then to here, which at least is warm and with a high ceiling not too smoky.  Fine chocolate cake.

After CDs, to the National Gallery in the Kinský Palace – rather depressing contemporary graphic stuff – poor Klee etc.  The Bohemian glass: like silver in Bali – miles of it.  But without the push: service is a concept barely known here. Nice in a way – tiresome in others.

The Slav faces – either very box-like, or thin.  The women with thin, slit eyes in both cases.  Strange how in Italy ugly women almost don't exist, but here the reverse is true (relative, of course).  Redheads and blondes quite common.  Eyes indeterminate in colour.  That characteristic Prague sound: the beep-beep of the metro's guides for the blind.

One thing, though.  In "The Prague Post", under Thursday November 4, there is: "Who'd Believe It Anyway, Mr Moody?" (Kdo mi to uvěři, pane Moody?).  In Czech with English text to follow.  Black theatre fantasy with actor Jan Potměšil.  Divadlo Mionor 7.30."
How did they know I was here?

7.11.93

To the Castle (comedy of trams II); to the Gothic and Baroque collection in the cloisters of St George's Basilica.  Free today.  The omnipresent ladies of the galleries wave us through like something out of "Blue Velvet".  The Gothic art has a strange quality: you sense for the peasants these were miraculous images, icons; more powerful than in West Europe, say.  The sense of synchronicity: what happened here, and in Italy at the same date.  The Slav eyes in the pictures.

An Annunciation with a wonderful cubist angel – wings everywhere, and a fractal sky.  A gargoyle dog, baying at the rain.  A Christ of Master Theodoric, almost twentieth-century naive.  Many more pix here than in UK for this time (dissolution of monasteries later?).  A crucifixion: with a man leaning on a shield in the form of a face – fine pic.  Amazing abstract Madonna and Child.

To St. Vitus Cathedral, where there is mass.  Rather dull – sermons in Czech are worse than in Indonesian.  Cold too.  Interesting trying to read the service book "Otčenáš".  Good organ, so to speak.  Then to self-service restaurant for unsatisfactory meal.  Sky lighter now.

Back to the cloisters of St George's Basilica. – and the world's first hologram – a painting that changes as you move round it: 1603 painted, Maximilian I and Ferdinand I, by Paulus Roy.  Some brilliant portraits – many by Jan Kupecký.  Landscapes of Vaclav, Vourinec Reiser, not bad.  The vignettes of Norbert Grund – cross between Pietro Longhi, Gainsborough and Guardi.  

Tremendous gargoyles on the cathedral, now slobbering after the rain.  The stuff of nightmares.  Did I see one move…?

To Kinský Palace, national collection of European art.  Familiar ground.  Lovely Vivarini, also fine icons – some from Benátky – Venice and Řecko (Greece).  St Luke drawing the Virgin – with another image deep in the background.  Dürer's Feast of the Rosary – very heavy, virtuoso but not moving.  Stunning view of London by Canaletto (1746).  Westminster Bridge spanning Thames, Westminster Abbey to the left, Lambeth Palace to the right – used by Canaletto as his viewpoint.  Also visible Banqueting House, St Paul's in the distance.  Rembrandt – The Scholar in his Study.  And even a Willem Kalf – with peeled lemon…  Two fine Kokoschka's of Prague.

Dinner in Bistro Mozart – good but expensive.  To National Theatre for The Makropulos Affair, Kr.160 for brilliant seats II balcony, first row, seats 15 and 16.  Lots of gilt and maroon and sumptuous naked ladies on the ceiling.  The orchestra desperately practising the tricky bits.  Not very full, alas, for such a great work.

Fine music indeed.  And the singers not bad.  Indeed, the only real difference between them and better-known names is that the latter...are better known.  That is, in some sense Prague is a pre-television world.  But for how much longer?

8.11.93

Thoughts about The Makropulos Affair: consider, a woman who travelled Europe for 300 years, spoke Greek, Spanish, French, Czech, and searches after a document, written in an obscure language: surely a symbol for Europe and the Maastricht Treaty.  Also Charles Burney's travels through Europe, musically, and the Grand Tour.

To the Ghetto – amazing jumble of gravestones in the cemetery.  The graves with small stones balanced on them.  Very peaceful with the autumn colours. (And pieces of paper, coins, stamps, chestnuts, majolica.)  Amazing effect of the higgledy-piggledy gravestones – a sea of them – like the view from the plane in Kashmir.  Also the trees add something – especially in the middle of the city.  A tomb with lions – with pieces of paper in every crevice.  Some graves pitch black, others pink, white.  To Pinkas Synagogue – amazing to see the wall of names being re-created, one by one.  What a task – painful to see.  77,927 names – the only such memorial.  

We pass two Italians we sat opposite at lunch yesterday·  Prague is small: you really do keep crossing paths (like in Venice, Piazza San Marco).

To the exhibition of children's and adults' drawings for Terezin.  What a waste of life and creativity there.  Into antique shop – sewing machine: Lada.  Underwood typewriter with Czech keyboard.  To the Rudolfinum – in the empty café – very grand, as is the main entrance hall.  Drinking 
glühwein and grog (supplied as rum, very perfumed, and a glass of hot water).  Grog (if put together correctly by me) – no great shakes.

Over in the old part under the castle (over Charles Bridge, still very romantic) – to a fine restaurant – U Modré Kachničky (The Blue Duck) – three rooms, very luxuriously done out – walls painted plus turn of the century pix – heavy credenza, floral carpet, crystal glass.  We are in the back room – glass roofed.  Soups – quail's eggs and potatoes, venison consommé and vermicelli.  To follow, carp and caviar (the real stuff).  Behind me a fine white heating oven (as in the castle).  (Address: Nebovidska 6, Praha 1, Mala Strana).  

Across the bridge to the island (complete with pink carnations courtesy of the Blue Duck restaurant).  Beautiful park in autumn, and stunning views across the Vltava.  Charles Bridge, the weir and in the distance the sugar-loaf form of the National Theatre (trams passing).  Subdued roar from the weir.  Swans glide gracefully below us.  The black forms on the bridge like frozen pilgrims, or the gargoyles on the cathedral.  The swan ringed on its right foot.  A beautiful island to the right, its trees a fine spray of yellow.  Raining slightly, but not too heavily.

Walk back under Charles Bridge – fine piazza to the west.  Then up to St. Nicholas Church, massive from the outside (one of my favourite squares).  Inside much lighter – partly because of the sheer size.  Fine trompe-l'oeil on nave roof – with St Nick very palpably swept away.  Mozart played on the organ here, and after his death the Requiem was sung here.  Wonderful organ – covered in scrambling, tumbling putti (gilt).  And each pillar ends in a huge cardinal's beret, with sharp diamond points.  The ceiling's fantasy is rather fine: a tower with a ship moored behind, a triumphal arch at the crossing of the nave.  Everywhere gilt and fine marble.  Organ banked in three tiers on each side, and three tiny ones in the middle.  Glass in windows mercifully clear.  And the whole of the altar very effective – the crescendo of pillars, statuary.  Has to be one of my favourite Baroque churches now…

9.11.93

Our penultimate day – and already sad at the thought of leaving this hospitable city.  To the St Agnes Cloisters.  Exhibition of Chinese wall paintings – very simple, very effective.  And I think of all the beautiful things that exist, and wonder why there is so much ugly suffering.  To the picture gallery.  Fine portraits by Machek.  Curious allegory from the ceiling of the dining car of Franz Joseph I.  Amazing effect of light.  Evening in Tyrska Lane by Jakub Schikaneder (1855-1924).  In the last room, a tiny Caspar David Friedrich – a jewel whose magic is instant.  Robert Russ – Mill in the north Tirol – amazing effect of light, and of the trees.  Quite a rich gallery – if you're into Czech art – and quality surprisingly high.  Again just goes to show that it's history/choice/fate that decides who is great/mainstream/famous.

Heard the clock-tower strike – gawping with hundreds of others… not very impressive – either spectacle.  Eating downstairs at one of the restaurants neaby .  Poor meat again.  Upstairs to Café Mozart...two espressi.  Outside a jazz band – and a man blowing the biggest, softest soap bubbles you ever did see.  The most wonderful rainbow-coloured wobbling gyrations as they miraculously rise (why?).

Walking around Můstek – buy book on Mozart – then metro, tram #22 to the Baroque St Nicholas church (fantastic fish shop on the corner on the way – with caviar).  Buy cassettes. now in Fruit Café with great view of this contrapuntal square.  Very noticeable that Czech magazines use every inch of the paper.  Old-fashioned design, too.  Poor half-tones.  Seeing the banner across the square for the Dubuffet exhibition up by the castle reminds how little France/French culture is in evidence.  Apart from the boulevards, this is the land of the Teuton, Slav – increasingly, obviously of the Anglo-Saxon…

To Beriozka for a minimally Russian meal (really for caviar).  Now in the Old Town Square – beautiful.  The Tyn church looms blackly over the sodium-lit buildings.  On the Bridge.  Prague Castle lit up in green and yellow – a wonderful slab of light on the hill.  Below us improbable seagulls squawk.  "Young people" play guitars and sing; the weir roars untiringly.  The church is orange ahead of us.  Trams cross by the National Theatre, which is lit green.  Everywhere domes and steeples and statues and facades and pillars.  Behind us, the Rudolfinum.

10.11.93

Sad to leave.  In "Der Spiegel", the President of Estonia, Lennart Meri, says "Eine Grosse Bibliothek ist ohne Wörterbuch nutzlos.  Wir wollen der Wörterbuch für Europe sein" – speaking of Estonia's position in Europe.  This morning, a final walk from tram #26 to the Old Town Square, across the bridge to the other bank.  Bought caviar.  Fine city.  

Now at the airport – outside, following an "explosives" alert.  Ironic for the country famous for Semtex...

Monday, 11 October 2021

1989 New York

8.11.89 Heathrow

Heathrow airport, on board flight BA 175.  Well, dull it isn't.  After my burglary (my burglary?  Well, more of that later on), a real, live (ha!) aborted take-off.  I was dozing at the time, as is my increasing wont.  We accelerated, then the brakes were slammed on – not hard, but hard enough.  Later, the captain explained that strong winds were blowing us skew off the runway.  We were already one hour late; now we are waiting for the brakes to cool.  I bet the hijackers on board are annoyed…

Read my first Paul Auster; it begins to fall into place: the New Metaphysicals: too clever by three-quarters.  Fun, but Auster rather empty.  Unlike some on this plane, I am calm.  I think the burglary taught me something: that I am essentially untouched by these events – because it does not matter.  Nothing really does.  If life is meaningless, so are delays and inconveniences.  The robbery of my flat was also a delicious experience in serenity; my heart moved not a jot.  Messy, perhaps, but interesting too: you need excrescences on the surface of life; a totally aerodynamic world is boring.  I definitely need to get married and have kids – now there's excrescences…

Room 1502, Hotel Dorset.  Amazing view from my room.  AT&T Building to the right, and the strange light-haze from the nearby Citicorp.  Flash room. $190/night.  NYC ground to a halt because of the rain.  Opposite me great chess boards of light.  West 54th Street below, together with the dwarfed rooftops of the apartments.  The hiss of tyres in the wet; aureoles of rain around the lights; car and truck horns.  I really like New York.

9.11.89 New York

An interesting day.  Up early (late body time), hashed beef breakfast – yum – then out to walk in the wet rush hour.  I find a CD hoard, then to the Frick.  A lady cab-driver tells me about her sushi-eating habits – but insists she is "not anal-retentive".  I find the Frick familiar.  Gob-smacked by the Bellini.  Again.  Great Vermeers (3), "Polish Rider" et al.  To the Guggenheim – disappointing again.  Lunch in the Met – where I see they have Canaletto….

To work.  Back in a cab driven by an Albanian: World War III is imminent, Gorby is a cunning commie.  He (the driver) escaped from Albania in '53, came to London to see an Albanian hit-man – killer of three KGB agents (?!).  Totally paranoid, bent by his past.

Then to the Met, an orgy of Canaletto.  Many early pix I've never seen.  And so close up, the paint almost tactile.  Bought the catalogue – and see that Constable is back in print - $260 – but I must get it.  I still feel strangely free of material possessions, even in buying them.  Writing now in MOMA – shades of Auckland, I don't think.

10.11.89

A bad, bad day.  Walked out of Ziff meeting.  Anyway.  Back at Met after stroll through beautiful Central Park.  Coffee and bread pudding in candle-lit cafe (K284 playing live) then – to the Canaletto, inevitably.

The Liechtenstein pix are a revelation.  The light and colours radiate, yet the skies are so moody.  Rio dei Mendicanti: contrast of white walls on the left, ragged, lived-in chaos to the right.  Figures very vague.  Physicality of brush-strokes in the sky.  A boatyard to the right.  Washing on roofs looks like festival pennants.  No dogs.  Is the building next to the church religious?  If so, why the flower boxes?  A tree in the centre.  

The first, famous (to Walks with Lorenzetti) Piazza San Marco.  It manages to be grand and provincial – a ragged Nowheresville that happens to be Venice.  Birds (aargh).  The stalls' shades like beach umbrellas.  Dogs.  Notice often greenery growing from buildings – desuetude.  The crowds by the clock.  Unlike Canaletto's later pix, these look even better further back – like the Impressionists.  San Giacomo di Rialto – this and a later one remind me of Kathmandu – Durbar Square, or between it an Freak Street.  The market.  The strange pictures like huge playing cards.

Some just don't work – that of SS. Giovanni e Paolo.  Rialto Bridge from the north: lovely light and shade: deep, dark colours, a slash of crimson.  The thing about the Grand Canal is that often you get extreme compression, which with the windows articulates the surface.  La Carità: something I've not seen before: a fire.  Venice is so watery – the embodiment of this element, it seems antithetical, the fire.

To the copperplates – and the world is suddenly full of light – no dark scumbling.  The clouds are thick.  The lines in the windows etc. are ruled – adds to the sense of certainty of the pic.  Sky not blue, but pale grey-blue.  The figure pissing against the Rialto bridge.  Very Levantine – the boats, the hats.  In this context, the Stonemason's Yard looks even more extraordinary.  The broken stones look out of place in this city of smoothness.

West end of Molo – very light in technique, like Guardi, lacks detail.  Pic of Orologio – beautiful bustle – a very people-centred pic – at eye-level for a change.  Scratching dog, lounging man.  Very thick paint on buildings.  Strange to see completely new pic – and viewpoint.  For example, San Cristoforo, Michele and Murano.  Square format – very thin paint – almost a sketch.  Odd angles – impossible view.  Mainland is disconcerting.  Pentimenti on Queen's Entrance to the Grand Canal are like ghosts, hovering beneath the surface.  Piazzetta looking north: brilliant red of figure; extreme perspective of loggia; very theatrical. 

The pen and ink drawings are ecstasy close up – like intricate Bach chorale preludes.  Studies are fierce – full of energy.  

The Fonteghetto della Farina – a shock to see images no longer there.  It is fun to see – and recognise – the Houston pix.  The shops in Canaletto are also like Kathmandu: small caves, huddled away – San Geminiano is deeply disturbing in Piazza San Marco, disruptive.  North-east corner of Piazza San Marco – big, bold treatment.  Messy details – planks, dogs, stalls, shades, very urban.  Shades look like bauta masks and hoods.  

Beautiful peaceful capriccio of house, church, tower and bridge by the Lagoon, delicate washes, free brushwork.  His Accademica pic is very theatrical, lovely diagonals, stage stairs, entrances and exits, unusual upward view – normally filled in by the sky.  The late pic of the Rialto – very busy (like Kathmandu) – the greenery, pots and pans.  

Perhaps the most surprising pic in the whole exhibition is Night Festival at San Pietro in Castello.  Night?? In Canaletto???  Reminds me of my Night Movement II – lanterns at night.  Here there are spots of light – especially intriguing inside the building.  Beautiful clouds with moon behind.  The confused bunches of people, the dark water, rich reds, the campanile.  I suppose in part the effect is helped by my ignorance of the scene.  Where are we?  Is it realistic?  Palladian facade.  The cloaked figures – a chill in the air.  The wooden bridge.  The dog in the boat; the Punch and Judy show (you can see Mr Punch's stick).  I have realised that I have regarded this as an island – not part of Venice…

Aha! - as I thought: it is an island – but also part of Venice – see map.  Its orientation is completely unexpected – a typically Canaletto re-ordering.

11.11.89

Remembrance/Veteran's Day.  I was roused by my early morning call at 5 – an attempt to return to GMT.  A strange feeling for the day, rootless, almost.  Glorious walking weather: 50°F, brilliant New York sunshine – reminded me of 5 years ago….

I sit now in The Saloon, opposite the Met (opera), nice bustly place – very Village Voice.  Failing to achieve figs and prosciutto, I am forced to make do with medallions of tuna, followed by marinated duck in aubergine.  A fairly strong Sauvignon accompanies the meal.

Yesterday at the Canaletto exhibition was really good.  Looking very hard at these pix, close up, some of which I knew, some not, was like an intellectual/pictorial work-out.  I kept on seeing more but forced myself to go yet deeper.  A paradigm of all seeing – and understanding.  I can see that Canaletto will be an obsession for the rest of my life – Walks with Lorenzetti has not exorcised him.

Down by the subway to Canal Street – partly after seeing an early Channel 13 (PBS) on Laurie Anderson – what a brilliant, spiky woman – who lives here.  Then around Broadway, West Broadway, Tribeca, Soho, Greenwich Village.  All vaguely familiar, but not exactly.  I could see myself living here, very bustling, young (ish).  Failed to eat at a Polish and Yugoslav restaurant – they took no credit cards, I was low on cash – thanks to my burglar (what fine word).  Back to the hotel, then to here.

More destinations:

Saturday, 2 October 2021

1989 Zürich

18.2.89

The great bell of St. Peter strikes 9.  A grey but bright morning; cold.
I arrived here at 10pm last night, a mere one hour and a bit from London.  This is almost a test-run: what is the viability of jumping across to Europe for the weekend.  I am staying at the Hotel Florhof behind the Kunsthaus.  Last night I watched TV in German, French and Italian.

Now I sit in the pleasant St Petershofstatt – very quiet everywhere.  Zürich is full of pastels: lime greens, strawberry pinks, vanilla creams.  The architecture is terribly circumspect, nothing is garish or untoward.  Everything is very neat.  Walking along the Limmatquai, things were only vaguely familiar.  Driving in from the Hauptbahnhof last night I did recognise the high stone wall of Seilergraben.  I think I stayed near here – the street Zähringerstrasse is marked on my old (1979) map.  I remember only the shower of the old youth hostel (?) where I stayed.  Zürich was pelting with rain, and I was freezing; it was one of the best showers of my life.

Zürich very quiet all morning until 10, when I go to the Oper.  "Marriage of Figaro", sold out for tonight.  Then to the Kunsthaus.  9 francs to get in – which includes the last day of an Egon Schiele show (£1 ~ 2.70 Fr).  Round the museum – lots of dreck, especially modern.  Few decent old ones – Canaletto, view of Molo with reception of ambassador.  Good Chagalls and Munch.  Lots of boring Schweizer and old German stuff. Few decent Impressionists.  To the Schiele.  Frightening stuff.  But what a fiercely personal vision this boy – died when 28 – had.  Lots of lacerating self-portraits, lots of nudes – the flesh beginning to turn like dead meat.  Some of the landscapes were new to me – strange gleaming reds, like haunted houses – impressive.

Almost casually, I decide to visit the "Je suis un cahier" Picasso exhibition.  I expect to be bored after the Tate show.  It is miles better.  The virtuosity which was hinted at there becomes explicit.  The sheets from the sketch books are all dated: often there are ten from one day.  Rarely is there a correction to them: just sure, swift lines.  Many are masterpieces.  But even more fascinating is to see how he worried at a theme, teased out nuances – and then changed completely.  For example, he draws a baboon's head a few times, simplifies, then leaps to Shakespeare.  Pure disjunction or inspired transition?  Now in the Kunsthaus restaurant, I gaze at the familiar Zürich rain…

Grossmünster: typically Swiss – no ornaments inside, just clean, grey walls.  It all looks too new: there is no sense of time passed. I wonder if I came here before?  P.m., the rain holding off a little.  A few more people around – about as busy as Bournemouth on a quiet winter's Saturday…  To the Fraumünster Church – more churches – dull inside. But brilliant Chagall windows, five of them, long and thin. Jacob, Christ, David in the middle, blue, green and yellow.  Wandering in the rain.  Zürich is still quiet – definitely a one-day place.  

Back to the hotel to watch 16 channels of TV.  Several times I have tried to take coffee at the Café Bar Odeon – Lenin's old haunt, and one that I found very pleasant ten years ago.   Today it is noisy and smoke-filled – hardly the haven of civilised quiet it once was.  One thing I have noticed: there is a fad here for deeply unattractive glasses – huge square things, odd wing shapes – yuk.  Also, it has to be said, there are not many attractive women here.  They look Swiss and serious – no spark or flair.  But then there is very little squalor  either – I have seen only one tramp, and everyone else looks well-off.

I am now sitting amidst the guildic (?) splendours of das Zunfthaus zur Saffran.  I received a very snooty welcome – no tie, unshaven, jeans, trainers: will he pay? They think.  I hope they take Visa…  This is a strange city.  It looks like a film set – it is too neat and tidy, too perfect.  I am on the first floor; as the trams go by, their metal conductors creep past the eighteenth-century windows like huge silent spiders.

More destinations:


Saturday, 20 June 2020

1988 Venice

Venice 1.1.88

My fourth trip. Venice is like memory: full of twists, sudden open spaces, sudden unknown views, dead ends. Sitting in the Ristorante Ponte di Rialto, I see the chef start preparing the pizzas for the evening.  An almost sensual experience as he rolls, breaks and moulds the wet clinging dough.  It looks alive, proto-human.  Typically, this is acted out at the front, in full view of the world  the Italians ever the actors and show-offs.  The gondolieri row from the waist: they lunge into the oar, doubling up.  The most striking thing about the Rialto bridge is how tacky it is – the wooden boards in winter look like an old railway arch.

The Rialto area is unusual in that there are fairly broad promenades each side of the canal.  Normally the water is only glimpsed along rii, or at a dead-end alley.  The Grand Canal is almost a secret place.  The paradox of memory: that you only remember how good things were in retrospect.  At the time the details get in the way, or you are not aware of an event's significance.  Gondolieri are like taxi drivers: they pull out in front of traffic with sublime disdain.  To be in Venice for the first time is like recalling a memory you never had.

From Rialto to Campo Santa Margarita – via Santa Maria dei Frari – as amazing as ever.  Campo Santa Margarita was also as strangely moving as before: its suddenness, its size.  I went there to find a café: closed, alas.  But further on in the campo an even smaller, more intimate one nestled.  I entered to growled but friendly Venetian accents.  The cappuccino, like all first cappuccini in winter, was ambrosia.  

Then along the Calle Lunga Santa Barbara to the Fondamenta Zattere Al Ponte Lungo, to the Church of Santa Maria del Rosario (Gesuati).  Again, curious to have one long path, and to be walking along the water.  Odd too to have the ghostly vision of Giudecca floating opposite, punctuated by Palladian churches.  Finally along to the Peggy Guggenheim gallery.  More thoughts on memory: in the middle of the gallery, photos of Peggy, with Henry Moore etc.  A gallery to her memory, in fact.

San Michele enshrines another sort of memorialisation.  Fondamente dei Mendicanti – a floating crib lit by a lurid green light – by the Ospedale Civile, with its internal landing bay for ambulance boats.  When in Venice, it is hard to remember we are there, in the only Venice.  In search of dinner, I went east.  I entered Piazza San Marco for the first time on this trip: my spirits rose at the huge open space, the tiers of white lamps like ribbons of light, and at the end, the great bubbly mass of San Marco itself. It is simply the most exuberant building in Venice.  And next to it, like a sentinel, the gentlemanly campanile.

I struck out into the backstreets; my goal, Santa Maria Formosa.  My feet moved half hesitating, half hurrying.  At each turn, views would strike me with a strange familiarity.  I crossed a bridge, and there in front of me was Santa Maria Formosa herself.  In remembrance of my first last meal in Venice, I ate in the restaurant nearby.  It seems to have moved up market.  The service was rather surly, but the food was quite good.

Campo Santa Maria Formosa was dark and quiet; even my old corner café had shut up shop.  I moved on, in the only direction possible. And there it was, the forestiera at the angle of the canal, by the bridge.  It was bigger than I remembered, but otherwise – again – looked unchanged.  Lights were streaming through the leaded panes of the main living room; I could see the beams of the roof and some mouldings on the wall.  Walking round to the left, I could make out the crude strip-lighting by the door to the men's dormitories.  I half expected to see myself staring out at this doppelgänger.

Thereafter I just wandered.  Venice at night is not the same as Venice by day: it is even less knowable.  The canals become invisible, just gaps in space; landmarks lurk in darkness.  There are pools of light under the lamps, islands.  There are very few people in the backstreets; everything is anonymous and deathly.

I ended up on the north side of Venice, opposite San Michele, whose cypresses could just be made out.  I passed down the Fondamente dei Mendicanti, past the garish floating crib, down to Santi Giovanni e Paolo, with the Colleoni statue high on its plinth.  Monuments, public memorials – art and the world is littered with them.

Thence a circuitous wander till I came to San Zuliano – the first time I have seen this, or noticed it; a fine facade, unusually placed in its own tiny campo.  Passing the cinema of San Zuliano, I heard the film "Opera" rolling: the projectionist's room gave straight onto the street.

Back in Piazza San Marco – again, with the past and memory pushing me on, there was only one way to go, to the piazzetta, to sit under the lion.  Except that the lion was not there.  His column was, certainly, but Venice's symbol had gone for a walk.  Disconcerting for memory to be thwarted so brutally in this way.  Sitting there, San Giorgio Maggiore was, happily, as stunning as ever.  But even this had changed subtly now.  I had read up Palladio's works; now Le Zitelle and Redentore – both lit up on Giudecca – entered my mental field around him.  I had been corrupted by knowledge and with it, my memories.

I wandered along towards Santa Maria Della Salute, looking grand floodlit.  Back through Piazza San Marco, past Florian's – which I'd never noticed before; it looked very pretentious – I must go in.  Then out along the Riva degli Schiavoni, past Vivaldi's church (we have Goldoni's two accounts of Vivaldi in his "memoirs", yet we know practically nothing of Vivaldi – except his music).  Out towards the funfair (dead), back to the hotel after another session under the lionless column, looking at Piazza San Marco in the sodium glare.  Somebody was letting off very lewd firecrackers.  Back to room 89, listening to Brahms organ music and motets, plus some jazz – all very late-night music.

2.1.88 Venice

Following the itineraries from Lorenzetti's astonishing book does have the advantage that you go places you would never have found: the feet have memories too, and tend to take the same tracks.  For example, Calle Goldoni, and Ponte Goldoni.  From the bridge there are myriad paths and canals.  Corte Grimani, looking back to Ponte Tron, I will remember this for Goldoni's sake.  Campo San Luca – a small, attractive, gratuitous place.

Along Riva del Carbon: Ca' Loredan.  Campo San Benedetto – small, but powerful: hidden by a nondescript building.  Adjacent to it, Palazzo Martinengo – a pediment of a church eats into it.  Opposite, the huge Palazzo Pesaro, some of its gothic windows bricked up.  All rather sad.

Amazing wooden staircase to the inside of Museo Fortuny: huge old oak beams.  Within: empty – I had to knock up the custodian.  To enter is to step back hundreds of years.  Everything on the first floor is hither and thither: Moorish helmets by the front door – with its typical round, leaded windows.  The exhibition seems to be revealing a studio – presumably of some Spanish painter of the early part of the century: there are monumental casts, huge lights with reflectors, lots of small oils, an enormous set of steps – for painting? - rich costumes – for historical scenes?  On the walls, thick hangings.

It is crazy.  Like a film-set, an old attic, a forgotten world, a memory.  I don't understand the place; and like Venice, I don't want to.  With only a few hints I can create my own meaning which is far richer.  There are signs – copies of Tiepolo, a quaint artist's settle with built-in easel.  But how can I have memories of this rich chaos?  It is like the Grand Canal: I may recognise it, have memories of it, but how except through years of familiarity can I ever get to know every moulding, pillar and arch?

One room is done out like a garden pavilion, with grottoes and views of distant country scenes.  In Venice you forget there is grass or countryside: this world takes over.  In the corner of this room there is a simple Duchamp-like basin with a crude tap.  All around it, there are daubs of old paint, as if in some de Kooning piece.  Above it, randomly, a dried ram's head made of clay.

Another theme is naked women disporting themselves.  They are young and beautiful; what memories did they hold for the painter and models when both were old?  Curious lamps hang from the ceiling: they look like Damascened shields, but are made of cloth.  The air is chill, and the faint stench of old Venice hangs over the scene.

One picture seems to be of the rooms: it shows an artist's studio, hangings everywhere – as in this exhibition.  Light streams in through an open window.  In the corner, there is a painting of a grey-bearded man, painting.  Among the casts there are two (!) of the death mask of Wagner.  None of this is labelled, but this is what cultural memories are for.  Other casts includes the Belvedere torso.  The Wagner is disturbing in its reality, its implicit outrage of the dead, helpless face.  At the other end, more naked ladies.  None of the paintings is signed.  Modesty or arrogance?

In a room marked "security exit", strange machinery.  A huge model of a domed theatre with amphitheatre-like seating.  Two strange devices, halfway between dynamos, phonographs and god knows what (theatre lighting systems?).  One painting signed: M Fortuny Madrazo: why the sudden weakness?  What did his wife – or any painter's wife – think of all his voluptuous nudes? The man locks up after I am gone.  A world closed.

Near the Grand Canal, the small bridges offer tantalising glimpses.  For example, Ponte de l'Albero: I can see a palace and glimpses of vaporetti and gondolas.  Images like life: partial, evanescent. One advantage of Lorenzetti is that he takes you every inch of the way: not just the hot spots.  Campiello nuovo e dei monti is odd – it is raised, probably because it was a churchyard.  What of all those buried here?

Piscina San Samuele.  Palazzo Querini - 15th century, but decrepit and easily missed.  A tablet to Francesco Querini (d. 1904), an Arctic explorer who died there.  A shocking sign: "Autoscuole Europe": uh?  Salizzada San Samuele: Veronese's house; could have been built in the 19th century, judging by its appearance.

Calle de le Carrozze - 10th century well head – Byzantine.  Campanile of San Samuele – a shock to see such Romanesque work: good clean lines, unflustered.  Reminds me of the church near Les Deux Magots in Paris.  Corte del Duca Sforza on the edge of the Grand Canal.  A two-person gondola-skiff – one gondoliere and a young lady.  Earlier, I saw what looked like a racing four-man gondola charging down the Grand Canal. Fondamenta della Scuola: "divieto di nuoto" – in the water?

Calle de Teatro, non c'e'Santo Stefano, glimpsed as it shuts (11.30am): unfortunately the rest of the world takes no account of Lorenzetti.  Campo Sant'Anzolo (=Angelo).  Cimarosa's land.  Many fine palazzi, brooding over all, Santo Stefano's leaning tower… Ponte Storto – another quirky corner: Calle Caortorta, giving on to the back of La Fenice.  San Fantino – Lorenzetti lovingly lists everything – including the only work of one Cesare delle Ninfe; his memory lives on.  

When we travel with someone, it is almost as a custodian and validator of our memories.  "Do you remember…?" we can say to prove our own memories have an objective existence.  This is why spouses, lovers and friends are so important: it is the old philosophical idea of our knowledge – like god's – creating the world.  Without fellow memories we are condemned to lonely solipsism.

The Palazzo Contarini del Bovolo is striking.  The spiral staircase looks quite new compared to the surrounding flaking walls and general squalor.

Walking with Lorenzetti is not easy; he is a perfectionist, a pedant, an enthusiast.  Sometimes you lose him as he dashes off down some tiny side alley while you are admiring the view.  He is inconsiderate: opening times, the difficulties, the audacities of seeing some of his objects, are great.  Like most people in love, he presumes a great deal, and is not really interested in your opinions, only your assent. (San Lorenzo on his griddle in the Gesuati – like Lorenzetti on his griddle of streets, all of us with the network of our memory…).

The diary is the ultimate recourse against oblivion.  But at its heart is a paradox: the more we write, the less we do.  Art at least allows us to be selective, heightening here, forgetting there.  But diarists like Pepys are something else: why did he do it?

Leaving someone close is like amnesia – voluntary or imposed: we lose great chunks of our past with them.  Perhaps this is why couples stay together long after affection keeps them that way naturally: to part would be to destroy their past as well as their relationship.  To leave requires a sense of optimism – which why the young do it far more easily than the old.

I have very few memories before Cambridge; thereafter I have developed an almost photographic recall of places I have visited. Food too can bring back the memories.  I am now eating fegato alla veneziana: it brings back vivid memories of when I ate this in Rome, just down from St. Peter's, two years ago.  

As in all this, time is relative.  A relationship may proceed so slowly, amount to so little, that seven years is less than seven months of an intense, experienced-packed affair.  Some people seem to have done nothing in their decades; others have lived – and suffered – a lifetime in a year.  Trips are the same: months in a city may teach less than a few days.  

On the Lorenzetti trail again – past San Moisè – definitely one of the most memorable facades – wild over-the-top Baroque, all swags and wild columns.  The soot and grime seem appropriate – so biased are we in our appreciation of the past.  Down the Calle del Teatro San Moisè – which opened with Monteverdi's "Arianna" – mostly lost.

Santa Maria del Giglio, or Santa Maria Zobenigo – a family extinct in the 12th century.  Santa Maria Zobenigo – very Bramante, especially the exterior, with its rounded braces – to the memory of the Barbaro family – four statues on the facade and maps and reliefs of various cities.  Inside, a fine organ case with instruments – reminds me of St Michan's in Dublin.  Wildly baroque side altars with rounded, broken encrusted pediments.  Rather horrible.  Rubens in the sacristy – he doesn't belong in Venice.  San Maurizio knocked down and re-built with a different orientation – so much for the past…

I stand on the Accademia Bridge; again.  To my left, there is that garden as shockingly green as ever; to my right, the Accademia.  I can count 19 palazzi from here to Santa Maria della Salute; but I may be wrong.  In any case, what do I know of them?  All I will remember is the idea of the Grand Canal, details will go.

Rio Terrà Foscarini is strange because it reaches from one side of the water to the other and is straight – an old canal that was filled in.  Gesuati not yet open – the world ignoring Lorenzetti again.  So across to Giudecca.

The old vaporetto is no longer as cheap as I recalled it – L.1500.  It is also rather disconcerting crossing the old Canale della Giudecca – is seems so far – again, I recall my last trip to Venice – when I took Linea No. 5 – all the way out to Murano and nearly missed my plane – vaporettos are like that: they have a mind of their own.

Walking along the fondamente of Giudecca is strange: across the way lies the real Venice – this is some kind of ghostly double.  And the Canale looks horribly magnified, as if the two sides are drifting apart.  To a café, just by Il Redentore.  This is none of your posy jobs: this is more Glaswegian minimalism.  Full of old men with thick glasses, stern-looking women, mad-looking ones clutching huge blue boxes.  On the wall, there is a technicolour photo of San Giorgio Maggiore, a faded print of Italy's football squad, a pennant for Florence, a still-life oil painting.  I drink yet another cappuccino – the taste of Italy.

Buonarroti lived on Giudecca when in exile from Florence, 1529: "per vivere solitario".  Il Redentore – built in commemoration of deliverance from the plague.  Facade very like San Giorgio Maggiore – but cooler, not so violent and thrusting.  From its steps it is particularly impressive – the edges of the pediments catching the shadows.  I enter and find Italian hymns playing.  It is probably appropriate.  The interior is much more lived-in than San Giorgio Maggiore: lots of candles, lamps, candles; and at this time of year, a presepio with the characters in 18th century garb.  It is dark and hard to make out Palladio's design.  Perhaps you really need faith to appreciate this church, whereas San Giorgio Maggiore is more purely aesthetic.  Churches are difficult: can we seem them truly as just works of art?  If not, what are atheists to do?

The view from the steps is wonderful: the sky is darkening, and the pink lights line Zattere and the Riva degli Schiavoni.  San Giorgio Maggiore is gradually glowing with its cool light. Zitelle is closed, but looks half-realised – not echt Palladio.  But the view from here is something else.  The bells are ringing: not single peals, but four notes.  San Marco is lit up, but half-obscured; La Dogana shines with its golden ball; La Salute rises proud at the end of the Grand Canal; Ospedale della Pietà visible too.

Vaporetto No. 5 back – rather worrying in its long, circuitous way.  To the Gesuati.  It turns out to be a real theatre of a church – very dark (at 5.30pm), with the altar and baldacchino black and brooding.  Tiepolos on the ceiling.  Unlike Redentore which jars in places, this feels of a piece.

I have seen so many churches today: how can the memory retain them all separately?  What will my memories be?  Compare looking at a room full of Jackson Pollocks at the Guggenheim (again): how do we look at them and remember them?  At least the churches have conventional figures, standard designs; what do we do with modern art, which has neither, and which tends to invent everything as it goes along?  There is interesting evidence on how we look at a painting's image: we jump around from salient point to salient point – a bit like a guided tour, moving continuously along a route, but stopping at the highlights.  All our memories are therefore journeys through a sequence of images, and past key points in those images.

Back to the hotel, past an antiquarian print shop.  I enter, and ask about views of Santa Maria Formosa.  They have two: the same, but first and second impressions, separated by a century.  £350 one, £175 the other.  The image is very simple: of the church and that end of the campo.  Quite effective.  I am sorely tempted… vediamo.

Eats at a nicely informal pizzeria Al Teatro Goldoni – which is precisely where I am now, to see – and possibly even hear – "Le donne gelose" by Goldoni himself in the theatre, which is just a few metres away.  Let's hope it is not entirely in Venetian dialect.  Curiously, the seats are not numbered.  This means that there is a huge, disorganised scrum to get a ticket, and then another pell-mell to get a seat.  I find myself in row G, on the end of the central block to the left (G11?).

The interior of the theatre itself is a curious mish-mash.  It is modern, with tolerably spacious seats – my father would approve – but the boxes above have an old-fashioned air about them.  The seats are rust-coloured, the walls of the boxes a horrible green.  The ceiling has the requisite chandelier (small), and a strangely oriental design.  Amazingly, there are no programmes; help.  A fairly small proscenium stage, with minimal set.

Alla fine del primo tempo – yes, well, it's almost "A Life for the Tsar" time: that is, I'm having to guess most of it as I did in Moscow when watching Glinka's opera in the Bolshoi all those years ago.  The dialect is very attractive to the ear – just incomprehensible save for the occasional word.  I shall not even try to guess the plot.  I will note though that people are not laughing very much – confirming my worst suspicions that Carlo is not a laugh a minute, whether in English or Italian.  The best bits come from the integration of the commedia dell'arte with the action.  The set is dull, the acting very static.  I am confused by the total emptiness of the boxes in the theatre.

The stones of Venice are a huge palimpsest, even though the city is not.  Everyone feels obliged to say "I was here".  On the Rialto bridge, there is one dated 1/1/88; and another which says "1915" – but no name; the span of graffiti is no doubt greater.  

Venice divides up according to the section of the Canal Grande: Rialto to Accademia etc.  The secret parts of Venice: just along from the contrapuntal Santi Apostoli; along the totally horrible Strada Nova – even worse with its Xmas lights, there is a tiny, dark alley, Ramo Dragan, which comes out under a low entrance to a jetty.  From here the Canal Grande curves away strongly to the Rialto, and round to Ca' Rezzonico and Ca d'Oro.  Opposite there is a fondamenta; it is completely empty now.  Magic.

Everywhere in Italy you get bill posting to the memory of the dead: "e' mancato all'affetto dei suoi cari…"  Passing Santi Apostoli – amazing, slow chant – but neither Gregorian nor anything else I know…

More secret parts: Campiello dei Miracoli; Ponte de le Erbe – three bridges visible, totally nowhere. Ultimo numero del Sestiere del Castello: 6828 (ha!).  So many secret places: Ponte del Piovan o del volto; rii split, bridges, back of churches.  Miracoli (again).  This has the makings of a nightmare; or like a memory which will not come back.  As I walk round and round, I have the image of another Italian city; I cross cobbled streets to a large square, brightly lit; Rome? It will not come back, even though I walk into this square again and again.  Then I find myself where I started, near the Rialto.

The second half of the Goldoni was better in some ways; the scene at night, everyone masked, was atmospheric and strangely moving.  I still could not understand what was going on; but I could take it metaphorically: maskers, confused groping, mistaken identities.  This is the cancellation of the past and memory – compare the Carnevale in Venice.

There are various stages to remembering a language: first the words themselves come back, the the ability to string them together.  Finally, you can begin to understand speech; the last phase is coping with dialect.

The Lorenzetti walks are becoming atolls of knowledge: when I come across a familiar street, I feel safe.  Certainly his itineraries divide up Venice.  What of Ruskin's "Stones of Venice"?  I have seen so many churches today; how can I remember them? How can I remember the Jackson Pollocks?

3.1.88 Venice

It's raining.  The streets and campi reflect the buildings around them. It is as if they remember their original state of water.  Venice is not designed for umbrellas: its streets are too narrow, and they stop you from taking in the view.

To the Accademia.  More changes: no free admission for journos.  A new law of 1985; how time flies.  So I pay the L.4000 and find myself face-to-face with Paolo Veneziano… At the left-hand base of the picture, two tiny people: due devoti, muscling in.  Room IV: a wonderfully stern San Girolamo – with yet another devoto (no wonder San Girolamo looks so miffed).  In the Piero della Francesca room.  The green of the hills that characteristic ochre (how do we remember colours? - it is like perfect pitch).

Room V: Giorgione's "La vecchia" with her scroll of "Col tempo" attains its sadness through the eyes.  The eyes which look at us, look at herself in a mirror: she sees this scraggy face and old body – but the continuity of her consciousness means that she cannot relate it to her self-image which is of the past.  It is as if the box we live in grows old, while the spirit inside does not.

Part of the richness of "La Tempesta" for us is in its mystery.  We cannot read it like some religious scene; it is romantic in its self-completeness.  So how can we look at it?  At the elements – the woman, the man, the lightning, the distant town, the broken pillars, the separating stream – or we can construct our own story, a path through the picture.  One thing is certain, it lives in the memory because of its magic.

Veronese's "The Feast in the House of Levi" dominates Room X; it is so vast. I know this painting, and yet I have never seen the dwarf by the stairs before, nor the gilt sculptures above the arches.  We trust that paintings and places do not change in the interim; but of course we have no proof…  There are – as near as I can tell – 64 people in this painting: how can I remember them?  What do I remember?

We must pass through a gallery as through Venice: picking certain routes, certain stopping point.  Otherwise everything becomes an undifferentiated blur.  Room XVII is one of the best: therein are contained the views of Venice by people like Giovanni Migliaia, Canaletto, Grandi.  It is the shock of recognition: Bernardo Bellotto's "Scuola di San Marco by SS. Giovannai e Paolo", Guardi's "San Giorgio Maggiore" – with the old campanile, thinner and taller.  

The wonderfully soft yet strong portraits of Rosalba Carriera, the paintings of Pietro Longhi – surely the real chronicler of Venice.  Room XX: the Gentile Bellini procession in front of San Marco – hundreds of people.   The changes and the continuity with the image today.  Past the little Madonna on the stairs.  I buy a postcard of part of "La Tempesta".  The bells are ringing clangorously in Santa Maria della Salute: how can I capture the moment?  A passing ship in the Canale della Giudecca sounds its horn – in tune with the bells.

Santa Maria della Salute is almost perfect; this may be because it represents the life-work of one man, Longhena.  The octagonal form is inspired: it is so gracious and airy; then the presbiterio, opening out again, out-tops even this antechamber.  The space beyond the altar extends this volume.  Again memory fails me: the cool white and grey of the main space reminds me of somewhere, but I can't think where.  Like so much of Venice, this place is a fractal (sic): you can home in at deeper and deeper levels, and find more and more detail.  For example, the altar, with its powerful baroque sculpture – almost Bernini.

I find myself in Caffè Florian; I noticed just along from here is a shop called Jesurum – I immediately thought of John Jesurun.  Now I sit in the window, with views of a wet and cold Piazza San Marco.  I have ordered cappuccino and a small cake; the bill, I notice, is a mere L.9,800 – just under £5.  This reminds me of my most expensive cup of coffee: it was in the Guggenheim Museum in New York. The pound was at its all-time low – about $1.15, and the coffee cost $2.  Yikes.  This seems more justified, because expected.

What can I say about this place?  I have never been here, so it is a new experience, a new memory.  It consists of three or so shallow rooms.  They are elaborately decorated with middle-eastern images of coffee et al.  The ceiling too retains an Islamic, oriental element.  All the walls are covered with glass, which with the old fading mirrors add an air of being in a museum – or a goldfish bowl.  The art deco lamps are help by bronze putti.  The seat is plush red velvet.

Why am I here?  Why are any of us here?  The tourists, no doubt, because it is famous: one more experience to tick off the list.  This is partly why I am here (partly?).  It is pleasant, to be sure, but £5 pleasant?  So is my response here any different from tourists in front of "La Tempesta"? At least I am conscious of what I am doing; though I would be pressed to find any better justification for it.

The music which acts as ampoules of the past is nearly always pop.  This is a for a good reason: the very greatest music says too much by itself - to accommodate yet more layers of meaning either does violence to the music, or it is simply overwhelmed.  But most pop is essentially trivial, and is the perfect vehicle for memories.  For the same reason, third-rate classical music like Albinoni's Adagio etc., will also do.  For me, I am reduced to a snivelling emotional wreck when I hear certain tracks from Supertramp's "Breakfast in America", Joni Mitchell's "Blue" and Sade's "Smooth operator"…

Writing is a journey: a path from the first sentence to the last.  Of course, you can jump, like taking short cuts; but this only takes you to another part of the loop: we are locked in the sentence's unidirectional linearity.  This writing mimics in part my walks: ideas and impressions are the sights and sounds. We contain within us our memories as one long journey: of our body.  It is as if a camera is running all our waking (and dreaming) hours; the camera is mounted in this strange device, which perambulates the world.

When we walk these unfamiliar or barely familiar scenes, choosing left or right for whatever reasons, there is a kind of determinism at work: whatever made us go left at this spot before is likely to affect us in the same way next time.  This presupposes a degree of constancy in the surroundings which will enable the same forces to work on us.  Venice, pre-eminently, offers that.

Looking in a libreria, I see a poster of the views of Venice.  They are the same as those I saw yesterday; apparently this is a definite series.  They are by two artists: Canaletto and Vetterini (I think – my memory is too short term), published in 1740-ish.  

With Lorenzetti again.  Inevitably, perhaps, his itineraries tend to start in Piazza San Marco.  As a result, you must move with the crowds for a while.  So, moving along Merceria di San Salvatore is a pain; turning down the tiny Calle dei Stagneri O de la Fava is a relief.  Across the Ponte de la Fava, there is a typically cut-off church, a very bare brick facade which reminds me of Gerona.  It is not often that the narrow winding streets become claustrophobic, because they are normally inhabited, there are windows and doors.  Calle Ramo Drio la Fava is different: it sidles past Santa Maria della Fava, whose steep wall bears down on you.  

To Campo San Lio.  Another delightful campo which I have never seen before; or have I?  It is like a game of deceit practised by a city.  To Campo Santa Maria – though only a few hundred metres from Piazza San Marco, I have never seen this in my trips to Venice.  Ponte del Cristo.  Three canals meet at a right angle; down the smaller, two bridges; the larger moves away grandly.  (Whilst admiring a stunning black-haired young lady mouthing beautiful gravelly noises down the phone in Campo Santa Maria, I put my foot in a juicy one: the first time on this trip – and how apt…) Fondamenta dell'erbe: traditionally a pictorial viewpoint (I saw a postcard of it today).  Attractive Gothic palazzo at the end of the fondamenta.  Beautiful carved wooden door.  

I had not expected to see Santa Maria dei Miracoli so soon.  Last night, when I came across it twice, it seemed miles from anywhere, as if it were one of those places which we can only find late at night, or in exceptional circumstances – as in "Le Grand Meaulnes".  But here it was, sitting by the side of a small canal.

Inside is even more amazing: jewel-like is the only description for the tiny details of the place.  Rich grey marble facing the walls of the nave, veined like blue cheese, make the whole surface bubbling and alive.  The design is unusual:  a raised altar with balustrade, plus a gallery at the back.  Otherwise a simple barrel vault, ornately carved, gilt, and with 50 or so square paintings of saints and patriarchs.  The optical effect is curious: because of its regularity, it assumes a kind of hypnotic power.  The floor too is marble.

The carving around the base of the main arch over the altar is beautiful: mermaids and cherubim.  Rich intricate forms and gilt under the gallery.  The supporting piers have carving which is fully three-dimensional: there is space between parts from the body of the stone.  The facade is very different too: porphyry and marble, with a large rose window.  Brilliant composition down the side of the church from the Ponte dei Miracoli: the pilasters line up hypnotically.  Another fine view from Piazza Santa Maria Nova.  It looks like a train, with its narrow, compact form.

What can one say about Santi Giovanni e Paolo?  Well, Lorenzetti tries to say it in densely-researched pages.  This church has more in it than most museums; you could spend three days, two weeks, just looking at everything here.

Santi Giovanni e Paolo is huge: I had forgotten the sheer impact of it.  I had vaguely remembered the monuments; but not this amazing density.  It is like a huge memorial to Venice's glorious past, placed in a Musée d'Orsay-type setting – a barn, a railway station, a huge Battersea Power station (but imagine turning Battersea Power station into Santi Giovanni e Paolo).  Someone has lit the apse; the altar is visible now; I think I prefer it dark, like Gesuati.  The monument on the right of the nave with the three statues is particularly striking.  As ever, I ask: how can I look and see and remember all this?  I can't, and so shall not try.  I shall walk round (note: Lorenzetti is organised as an anti-clockwise circuit), trying to find among the desperate richness of Lorenzetti things I see.  NB: this is like memoriousness: too much data, not enough info because these is no way to organise it on paper.  Perhaps hypertext is the answer, or an intelligent book, context sensitive.  At this level, a wise fellow traveller is necessary, perhaps.

Imagine how many years of Lorenzetti's life it took to write the book.  Note too there is no other guide like it: not for London, Paris, Rome etc.  Venice is unique.  Because of its size, you can walk it; because of its art, it is memorable; because of its uniqueness random wandering pays off: every step.  It is all so integrated and connected – links by culture as well as space (Lorenzetti says this in his intro): "a guide in time as well as place".  This is the book of his life as well as lifeline.  Compare Proust: his novel is a guide to his life – and to people as well as places, of Faubourg Saint-Germain, his Venetian nobility.

With all the monuments, the walls seem crawling with life.  The very simple design of the church is probably crucial, especially the pillars and windows (which are few).  The chapel of the rosary comes as a surprise: it is warm, there is the smell of incense.  It is also alive with sculpture, carving, painting.

I love the pay-as-you-go lighting systems in Italy: L.200 in a little box for five minutes or so.  It sums up memory and visiting these places so well: you always have a finite time – so what do you look at?  I always try to turn away before the light goes out: active rather than passive loss.  I have been here about 90 minutes; it is dark, very cold; I am less than half-way round the itinerary: Lorenzetti has defeated me.  I'm going home - well, "home".

It is 6 o'clock in Piazza San Marco; the campanile's two bells are a semitone apart and hang in the air like a gamelan.  It reminds me of one 6am two years ago.  And now they have stopped, and other more distant bells ring in answer.  Older, less pure. Like San Gimignano, Big Ben, Cambridge, church bells everywhere, to remind people, to commemorate.  Bells mark time – for example in music..."mortuos plango, vivos voco".

Lorenzetti beat me because of time: it was dark and I was barely half-way round his itinerary.  Lorenzetti does not work in the dark: you need the long views.  Venice at night is not the same city – you would need another Lorenzetti.  I was also beaten by the trump card of Santi Giovanni e Paolo; I was not prepared for the sheer richness of its holdings.  I found myself in a black hole of culture: its massiveness and attractiveness were too great.

But like all such failures, it is also a victory.  A victory in that I have gained the knowledge that Santi Giovanni e Paolo is far richer than I imagined; that Lorenzetti is not to be taken so lightly.  Next time I will be better prepared.  And this is part of the attraction of Venice: the next time, the sense that your memories of now and the past will contribute further.  It is when there is nothing to look forward to, no further richness, that ennui sets in.

I am sitting now just by the Sotoportego e Corte de Ca' dei Riva; I am probably in the corte part.  From my table, I can see Florian across the way.  People walk across my view like fish in an aquarium.  Like fish, they glance in at me.  They remind me of Bede's bird winging its way through the hall.  They cannot resist looking in; and when they meet my stare, they quickly turn away.  People move past the confined space like characters in a strip cartoon – snapshots.

Going out the long way to the station.  It is much further than I remembered.  Near the station, the shops get tawdrier and tackier.  The station is not just a railhead, but a beachhead of the outside world; here everything modern seeps in.  The station itself is surreal: this unadorned slab of light, with the huge waste of space in front.  It looks like the aliens have landed.  And opposite, San Simeone Piccolo, my first sight of Venice.  Along the way, half-remembered sights, plus lots that were completely strange.  It is a different world beyond Santi Apostoli.

The way across the bridge is strangely disconcerting: the streets are narrow, poorly signposted, and unattractive.  There are no churches, no campi, not even canals; you wonder if you have made a mistake.  Again, the feeling of disjunction.  There are trees in Campo San Giacomo dell'Orio.  I have never been there before.

Now I stand under what looks like the market: colonnaded and arcaded, opposite where I looked yesterday.  Totally devoid of people; certain parts of the city are a ghost town.  I am directly opposite my little calle: I can see people crossing along the Strada Nova.  Opposite me, down the whole stretch of the canal, there are probably just 20 windows lit up; who lives in these palaces?  And what happens in the rest of them? 

From the Rialto I took No. 1 vaporetto.  This is how the Grand Canal should be seen: from the water, at night.  It is quiet, there is practically no other traffic; and the palazzi brood gloriously.  In fact, Lorenzetti puts this as the last main itinerary, rightly so: as you pass along, you can see all the little campi and fondamenti along the canal, and can join them together with a different thread.  Ideally one day you would join up all the bridges by travelling through the rii.  But there is an irony: Lorenzetti's itineraries are predominantly about walking; only Jesus could walk the last itinerary.  For the rest of us, the speed of the boat becomes another apt symbol of how experience rushes by us with little time to take it in. 

Passing by Santa Maria della Salute, it is clear that this is a total masterpiece, a kind of Venetian Taj Mahal.  At night, the orecchioni seem to flow down, and there is a veritable forest of statues up there (50, perhaps?).  San Giorgio Maggiore palely lit up across the water.

4.1.88 Venice

A quick glance at San Marco.  Again the richness, but especially the sense of time.  In its darkness and design, this moment could be 1000 years ago.  Looking at some of the friezes in the cupola, I thought: each of these has a meaning and intent: is it possible to know them all?  He – Lorenzetti - did…

On the Lorenzetti trail.  From San Marco to San Zulian (what a good Venetian name).  The facade is rather odd, with windows in the pediment, and a large commemorative slab in the face.  Also inscriptions in Greek and Hebrew.  Then on round the back streets to Santa Maria Formosa.  This is definitely mine.  The Querini-Stampa gallery is closed (again).  It is very cold today: I can barely hold my pen; but the sky is beautifully clear.  

It is so cold I have had to return to the hotel to write.  It is strange how I can bring back with me the images: the last monument on Lorenzetti's itinerary was, aptly enough, San Lorenzo – still unrepaired since World War I.  It has a fine brick facade, and is set behind its own deep square, leading to the canal – one of the long straight ones which cuts through from north to south. It is quite foggy now; it will be fascinating to see Venice under this aspect.  Very "Don't Look Now"...

I follow Lorenzetti's back-routes to San Francesco della Vigna.  An absolute warren, poor but interesting.  The facade is familiar – not from before, but because it has a characteristic Palladian design of two pediments, one piercing the other.  It is massive and impressive. The interior is rather four-square – the same grey and white as Santa Maria della Salute.  It is quite light, and packed with minor art, according to Lorenzetti.  

Back to Santa Maria Formosa.  The facade facing the campo is, like its name, very full and flowing.  Inside is simple, and looks typically 17th/18th century, rather than older.  It seems a living parish church.  I walk to the Accademia, and then round and round; I am cold and exhausted.  However, I did come across the Locandia Stefania near San Tolentini – which I am pretty sure is where I stayed my second time in Venice.  It cost me L.10,000, I recall.  I also remember the green-blue colouring of the walls, the central hall – very cold, and my very small room, barely a cupboard.

I was looking for somewhere to eat; there was a place near to the locanda, but unspecial.  I probably should have taken it.  My wanderings finally brought me back to the Accademia, and then beyond (to the Peggy Guggenheim gallery), where I have found a trattoria of sorts.  Venice is defeating me: although being here is an amazing experience, I cannot take too much of it.  I am still not sure that I have taken it in – that I am here.  I look from the Accademia bridge, at the sights, but it is like an image, not my reality.  I think I will have to leave writing about it for a while.

I must own up to doing something rash: I spent L.300,000 on a print.  I hope this is another small victory.  Not just any print, of course: Canaletto's view of Santa Maria Formosa, engraved by one Visentini: second edition, sometime around 1800.  It is an interesting object: a second pull of an image engraved from a drawing of a sight 200 years ago.  And now it will grace my world as one of my artefacts.

Correr Museum – Venice's image of itself, and a unique view on to Piazza San Marco.  There is a picture from around 1650 which shows Venice almost identical to today.  Crazy image by Antonio Canova: it is called "Ritratto di Amedeo Svayer". He looks about 30 stone, and has what seems to be a skinned rat on his  shoulder.  A roomful of lions of St. Mark.  The library: a fine high room.  A roomful of apprehensive-looking Doges.  With their wigs and hats they look like sheep.  A roomful of coins.  After roomfuls of third-rate Madonnas, it is a relief to get to the cases of Urbino maiolica – very peaceful colours. Then a slow cappuccino, plus an equally slow read of "La Stampa", still my favourite Italian newspaper.

Leaving Venice is easier than you might think – if only because it is a place where you always intend to return to.  Therefore nothing feels closed off, finished.  All those things you meant to do, you can do next time.  Thus this time I failed in a number of respects: I never finished yesterday's Lorenzetti itinerary; or visited San Giorgio Maggiore; or San Michele.  It does not matter.  

Disgusting as it is, I love the smell of Venice.  When you leave a hotel or gallery, it hits you and says: "it's me".  The fog has lifted slightly; as the light fades, it acquires a blue hue as my eyes have been corrupted by the yellow lamps in the hotel.  Outside, I can see a small rio with covered gondolas.

The mist and the night: perhaps the kindest way to leave it; just like the lights going off in the churches.  The city sinks into darkness as if into its waters – as one day, millennia hence, it will indeed do.  Thereafter, it will exist only as a memory, like Atlantis.

Walks with Lorenzetti

More destinations: