Thursday, 2 July 2020

1986 India I: Delhi, Agra, Fatehpur Sikri

23.10.86 Delhi

Connaught Place has the feel of eternal cricket afternoons – cut grass, dust, heat haze.  Not as squalid in New Delhi as I expected, nor huge number of beggars – a few gypsy/Dravidian women, a few cripples.  Traffic very India – lots of motorised rickshaws, pedestrians going everywhere.  As you walk down the street – incense now and then – everything is garish – trucks, hoardings.  

Delhi old and new, poor and rich.  NB Lutyens' gracious avenues, lawns kept immaculately like Surrey Gardens.  Cows pulling the lawn mower.  Hundreds weeding.   A snake charmer; ants the size of dogs (well, very small dogs).  Rajpath – an architect's dream – an arch like the Arc de Triomphe, mile-long road rising up to government buildings.  Red dust gives way to warm red sandstone buildings – looks like Versailles, but more spacious – the hill is a gift.  Style a mixture of classicism and token Indian.  Lies almost due west, like a church: the sun sets behind it.

Delhi at night – pleasant warmth.  Feels just like Samarkand, Banjul – garish lights, small children, pools of light.  Doesn't feel dangerous – partly because all the people here are small.  Even labourers are half-hearted, thin.  Sikhs are more muscular.

Regal cinema – full – livid-coloured posters; incense burning around.  Connaught Place a huge, dimly-lit amphitheatre.  But not real feeling it is a bustling capital city – everything is on a small scale.  Hotels seem centres of activity, with two or three restaurants, visited by locals.  Restaurants have a huge number of swirling waiters, threadbare linen, dubious cutlery.  Unfortunately, their idea of sophistication is vaguely-Westernised food.  No beef or pork, so chicken, lamb, fish and the music – sitar, tabla, portable harmonium.  Male and female singers.  Maudlin swoopy stuff.  Perhaps this is why the Victorian Raj fared so well in India – they had similar tastes.  Sitar risks a few extreme passages.  Harmonium warbles away.  Female voice very young , very Kate Bush, who uses similar ornaments.

Very strange day – spilling into yesterday, which didn't really exist.  Just travelling in similar metal tubes, with hours shifting constantly.  Having lost time, I have also lost distance.  I have not yet managed to place myself here: it is as I am in a very large Indian film-set somewhere outside Bradford.  Except that the sun is shining, and the temperature in the 80s.

On Indian TV, the language is formal – TV announcer finished with "cheerio and chin up".  Papers and videotext news items read like a gentle parody. 

24.10.86 Delhi

Up to the first class reservation office via rickshaw – typically held together by solder, bits of wire, welding, all on their last legs.  Driving slow-ish, but daredevils – a thousand near-misses – scattering pedestrians.  A wonder they obey the traffic lights.  First class reservations claims to be computerised, but that seems unlikely.  I wanted an Indrail pass, and wandered through administrative bowels of the building.  Lots of ancient typewriters lined up – another reason English will always be the language of administration.  But everyone unphased by strangers wandering – a bit like the sacred cows in the streets.

To New Delhi station, although this is much more Old Delhi, the real Delhi.  There were cows standing amidst bus queues.  A throng around the station.  Few touts or hawkers.  Station itself dark, with people everywhere, sitting, squatting, lying.  Notices directing hither and thither.  The Tourist Office a relative oasis of calm.  Very affable bloke – pointed out that I need a permit to go to Kashmir.  Gave me a slip of paper with the address of the Ministry of Home Affairs, ominously "beyond India Gate".  It proved to be my first real brush with Indian bureaucracy.

I bought the "at-a-glance" timetable.  The ads show the same upper-class 30s English.  Ads for snuff and recondite engineering products, all backed up with exhortation like "Get the best" etc.  Typically Indian printing – poor quality paper, some puce (cf. Suffolk pink), heavy printing, with movable type.  Introduction has some gentle, faded English, meticulously polite.

Lunch at Kwality, a well-known chain.  Nothing special – I think my chicken saved people the trouble of killing it by dying of malnutrition.  The hotel restaurant is better – but not better than my local take-away.  

I went further north for North Delhi station, which is opposite main bazaar.  Very definite change here.  People were living on the streets.  Cooking, washing utensils in puddles, washing themselves from standpipes – a girl wringing out her hair, a main holding up a cloth around himself like on a Cornwall beach.  Everyone cooking.  Everywhere food on sale – fried balls, fresh limes, fruit, daal.  Everywhere tiny stand-up restaurants – often called "hotels" – tin shacks behind shacks, everyone bustling with tiny jobs.  I saw one bloke selling Spirograph drawings – successfully.

Further north, poorer.  There exists a definite hierarchy.  Taxis and motorised rickshaws below Connaught, then motorised rickshaws to North Delhi station, then horse-drawn rickshaws, bicycle rickshaws, something I hadn't seen south.  Then even further, rickshaws with no tires.  The streets were crowded along the walls with people and their possessions – sometimes a tiny pile of bare necessities.  And yet most are modest.  There was little oppressive begging, and people seemed content to live their lives – just in public.  

After lunch, to the Home Affairs Ministry.  First we queued to get in.  Then we queued to get a pass.  Then we went upstairs.  Some queued to get a form; others of us just got it.  The we queued to go to room 2.  And waited.  Unfortunately, at this point the queuing system broke down.  One had to resort to downright cunning.  Eventually we got to the inner sanctum.  And then queued.  When our turn came, a man simply wrote in our passports that we could go to Kashmir.  The form we had filled in was not even glanced at.  Just filed.  I have a horrible feeling this may be the tip of the iceberg.  What was noticeable was that the Indian bureaucracy seemed so huge it was normal.  Forms appeared, books were filled in, people handed out, shepherding in.  You've got to employ 700 million people somehow.

Walk back very pleasant through wide leafy avenues.  Rush-hour – but on a smaller scale because roads are wide, cars are few, and many people use bikes or rickshaws.  Overall effect very human.  Buses are one of the few things which lack much English: just Hindi and numbers.  Rajpath very peaceful as India Gate and government buildings on the hill start to fade in the haze and thinning light.

25.10.86 Delhi 

The day starts early.  By 9am the sun is already strong, though the atmosphere is thick with haze.  The sun also sets early, lending the whole of the latter part of the afternoon a kind of eternal English summer's day quality.  To the tourist office again.  More queues.  But eventually I bought my Indrail pass, and reserved some of the seats.  Despite the frustration of the (Westerner) queues, the officials maintained an even humour.  The respond very well to courteousness.  But nothing is closed.  I obtained only provisional reservations for trains coming from other centres – Jammu and Udaipur.  Pretty brisk work – only two hours.  On the way, I saw my first leper.  His fingers had been reduced to the last joint.

After lunch, I hopped over the wall and went to the International's swimming pool.  Not that I swam.  But 50 Rs. was still good value, allowing me to lounge in the sun in my swimming trunks.  Even just after midday, the sun was very benign.  With palm trees all around and the waiters serving efficiently, it was easy to forget that over the wall lay Janpath Road and the beggars.  I left about 3.30pm; the sun was weak and low, and held little power.  This gentle warmth pervades the rest of the day and early night.

After an extensive coffee break, complete with timeless universal cameo of corner tete-a-tete – "I will be frank – will you be frank?" - I tried to reserve some hotel rooms.  I phoned the telephone desk to book calls through to Srinagar.  Several minutes later, I was told that there were no lines on to Udaipur, Agra.  A strike for a week, evidently.

A walk into town.  Everywhere a-swirl with people.  Connaught Place looks more impressive by night.  By day, the open space in the middle diminishes it; the surrounding buildings fail to bind together.  By night, the garish lights turn it into a huge amphitheatre.  It also forms the perfect space for a passeggiata, and this Saturday evening, many did so.  Most shops stay open to 7pm, some to 8pm.  Hawkers sat everywhere, polishing shoes, selling magazines and books.

Indians in New Delhi are very keen on books.  Mostly, these are British, some quite recent – latest magazines like Business, the Economist, Elle etc.  Even a computer bookstore with a rack of dBase III and C books.  Very aspirational.  Article in Sunday  - Newsweek/Economist type – led with the rise of the middle classes.  It claimed 50-100 million in this bracket, buying cars, fridges, designer clothes.  This is India's great hope, that and its insatiable desire for education.

The outer ring of Connaught Place is another example.  Hundreds of small shops, especially car seat covers, photocopy shops. Bare bulbs burning.  Several cinemas, all with solid names like Odeon, Regal.  Several eateries with lots of Indians.  The main restaurants are nearly empty – too expensive?  

I go to Gaylord.  There seems to be a lot of the Gaylord brand around – ice creams and such-like.  The restaurant is full of ancient semi-splendour, moulded swags on the ceiling, dusty chandeliers, plaster falling off central piers, showing the wood beneath.  Waiters ancient, but with a faded air of gentility.  Linen frayed and crumpled.  Food selection limited as ever, quality indifferent.  The only matter of note was the real spices – lumps of cinnamon, cloves etc.  Everything strangely quiet, as if everyone is waiting, or as if something happened years ago, but now has left everyone behind, still carrying on, but to no point.  I felt that I had been there forever, or for no time.

Walking back the air was still warm.  The shops along Janpath had placed all their wares on the pavement.  They all seemed to be painting their shops.  A festival?  Also, the booksellers had left their books beneath tarpaulin, unguarded.  Is the city really this safe.  It feels it.  

A note on Indian English.  Sunday, the magazine, used the phrase "chucked up".  I thought this was just another error; in fact, this is a real language in the making.  I cam across a book detailing the interesting divergences.  Indian English is not wrong, any more than American English is; just different.

26.10.86 Delhi 

Up betimes.  Indian Times, Sunday edition has pages of "brides wanted" and "grooms wanted". Would-be brides give age and weight, grooms their age and salary.  Women are either fair or homely.  Men and women emphasise their qualifications – women are "convented".  Really no different from the Village Voice personals.

To the Red Fort.  Surprisingly long way out, over the railway, past hovels made of cloth and wattle.  Red Fort area absolutely abuzz with people; real old Delhi.  The fort itself is stunning: huge red walls rising up sheer in an unbroken curtain.  Inside, once you pass the bazaar, all is relatively peace and stillness.  First there is the public audience hall – Diwan-i-Aam.  Today it is rather bleak red stone; once it was draped with fine cloths, and thronged with nobles, the prime minister before the emperor himself.  Today the well-kept grass again feels like an eternal British summer afternoon.

Behind it lies the main area within the fort, another open space with grass, but also with many fountains, sadly not working.  The main focus is the Diwan-e-Khas – the private audience hall.  Again much of the glory has gone – for example, the Peacock Throne; but the pietra dura inlays that remain, the ragged once silvered roof, do at least suggest past wonders.  As well as baths and various pavilions, there is Moti Masjid, the Pearl Mosque.  To enter, I was given over-shoes, and looked rather ridiculous.  The mosque itself is very small and intimate; particularly noticeable was how open it is: the sky forms an important element in the whole.  Interesting how many Indians had brought the family this Sunday.  Outside, there is a throng of hawkers et al.  But as ever, they are remarkably restrained.  I think this may be to do with my deeply black shades: without eye contact, it is hard to make much headway.  

For the same reason, my stroll down Chandni Chowk was uneventful enough, though I drew a few glances – partly because I was about the only white there, and about 6" taller than everyone else.  The usual sellers of water, but also many selling cheap garish posters – some of gods and goddesses, some of a semi-Indianised Jesus, some of saccharine little children.  As with the area around New Delhi station, mostly cycle rickshaws here – and piled with goods so high it passed belief – ten feet of laundry on one, wobbling precariously.

I took one of the rare motorised rickshaws to the Jami Masjid.  Since this cost me 5 Rs., I can't imagine what the bicycles cost.  The Jami Masjid complements the Red Fort.  Both are monumental, one sacred, the other secular; both were built by good ol' Shah Jahan, who seems responsible for many of the best bits of brick and marble in India.

As with the earlier mosque, it is like a cathedral with its roof removed.  After taking off my shoes and wandering around in my socks – again, rather daftly – I entered and brought a ticket for the tower.  There are two great towers flanking the main mosque. To reach it you climb up the wall then along, then up inside.  It is very narrow and very dark – a claustrophobe's nightmare.  At the top there is a low wall then a small balcony with an even lower wall – not for those with vertigo.  Noticeably, the Indians all kept inside; I didn't.

The view is superb.  Every city has one of these vantage points where you can sit and watch it unfold beneath you – the Campanile in Venice, the World Trade Center in New York (and London?).  The Red Fort was seen in its full splendour; nearby there were various parks with palm trees.  To the south-west, the mid-town high-rise developments near Connaught Place could be seen.  In between everything was a jumble of small buildings.  The haze of distance was very noticeable, and the horizon was lost completely  Much of this is smoke: the air is not very clean in New Delhi. The mosque itself is rather dull – with a smell of pigeons and decay.  Because of Islamic ideas, little decoration either.  

The trip back was less a journey, more an odyssey.  The traffic round this area had gone mad.  Everyone pushing and shoving – how bad accidents are avoided, I don't know.  Rickshaw drivers also take great delight in swooping across crossroads, even if they don't have priority.  Never mind overtaking on the inside, or whatever.  And they love their squeaky horns – a characteristic Delhi sound.  Yet the overall effect is comical – all the bicycles and rickshaws careening around like some huge dodgem.

PM to the International for poolside lunch and sunbathe.  I leave as the sun gets low and its rays weaken.  It is still only 3pm.

27.10.86 Agra 

To New Delhi station by taxi – a reasonable 15 Rp (about £1); road very quiet: London is busier than this.  Noticeable that all the hawkers and such like are absent from Chelmsford Road – what a name.  New Delhi station bustling; lots of offers of porterage etc.  Around 6.20am my train arrives. I have – I hope – reserved seat 4 in carriage 1.  There is no carriage 1 – or rather, it is carriage 3.  On the outside by the door is a computer print-out.  It looks strange to see "Glyn Moody" blazoned forth for the world to see.

The carriages are air-con, spacious and non-smoking.  Generally impressive.  Unfortunately, it turned out that the Taj Express was fatally flawed.  It wasn't express.  At about 9am, we stopped; in the middle of nowhere.  At first, it seemed temporary; after an hour or so, it clearly wasn't.  Like half the train, I decided to climb out to investigate.  I think this is the first time I've done this, and it felt very like being in some World War II film.  The train was very long, and people stood along its length.  It was lovely outside, and I was quite content to sit and watch.  Up ahead at the front of the train, some engineering works was going on, trying to fix the electrical conductor.

After a while, a distant hooting could be heard.  People cleared from the track.  I sat where I was: I thought it would be interesting to have several hundred tons of locomotive thundering past me.  It was; the earth shook authentically.  Unfortunately, a fine spray accompanies it.  I had forgotten about the toilets on board.  I confidently expect to contract some appalling gastro-intestinal disease. 

Eventually, we moved off.  We passed through small stations, all very quiet and sleepy – and sometimes literally.  We also passed trains going in the other direction.  Those carrying the workers into Delhi were crowded.  People hung on the outside, and even between the carriages, standing on the buffers.  We also passed a real museum piece: a huge behemoth of a steam train, battered and rusty but noble still.

We finally arrived in Agra some two and half hours late.  The hassling had begun on the train: people offering sightseeing, taxis. Luckily, it was a buyer's market: the main season begins in November.  So it was possible to ignore the rabble – though they were pretty persistent.  I was driven by a typical Sikh to the Clarks Shiraz hotel.  He loved Britain, he said, his father was in the British Army.  And sure enough, there was a Union Jack on the windscreen.  As we drove to the hotel, there were many army stations – Indian now.  The station we arrived at was Agra Cantonment.  With its spacious villas, Agra still has very much the feel of an Army town about it.

Booked in at Clarks Shiraz – for one night instead of two.  Tuesday completely full: mass bookings again – so unsporting.  Spent ages trying to get through to the Taj View Hotel – I was on the point of succeeding, when inevitably I was cut off.  In the end, I gave up, and went down to the swimming pool – fast becoming a pre-requisite in my stays.  Luckily they had a phone down there – of sorts, and I live in the optimistic hope of having a reservation.

I had assumed the sun would fall off in power just as in Delhi, but I realise now that Delhi is not representative, if only because it has so much smog.  Here the sky was slightly hazy, but much more blue.  The sun was stronger, but not fierce.  It is appallingly wonderful to lie out in it at the end of October.

About 3pm, I felt I had to see something of Agra.  Not the Taj Mahal, though.  I felt this with some certainty; I wanted to be fresh for the experience – not tired by delays and frustrations.  So instead I decided to visit Agra fort – yet another fort. There was no motorised rickshaw around, so I took a bicycle one for the first time.  We agreed on  5 Rs., with the possibility of extending the trip.  As soon as I mounted the frail contraption – there is no back support, and precious little to grab onto – I felt mortified with shame.  Here in front of me was a skinny little man, with his stick legs pumping away.  And there I was, a great lump of a Westerner, sitting back like some colonial oppressor.  It was even worse on one of the few hills I'd seen – most of India is completely flat around Delhi.  The poor little man had to get off and push it.  And yet I was a comparatively light load.  Indian think nothing of piling three or four people into these contraptions, plus plenty of baggage.

It was still a strange experience as we passed along to the fort.  Every now and then I caught glimpses of "it" – like temptations, invitations to taste a forbidden fruit.  I resisted.  After a fairly long while – Agra is really very spaced out, we came to the fort.

Initially, it looked almost identical to the Red Fort in Delhi, except that it was even more impressive.  This was partly because it stood in splendid isolation.  It certainly put to shame all our weedy British forts, Windsor only excepted.  Inside was even more miraculous.  Ascending a long ramp and then turning right, you are confronted with Jahangir's Palace, an enormous red sandstone building, with richly textured surfaces, a lawn in front, and all looking strangely quiet.

Entering, you come across a maze of rooms, some derelict, others still showing traces of former glory.  It certainly beats Delhi's Red Fort: it is large and brooding, and very evocative of ancient empires.  In fact, as one began walking through the complex, the scale gradually became clear; it was huge.  Unlike the Red Fort, which was primly guarded everywhere, here you could wander where you like, jump off where you like.  The views over the ramparts towards the Yamuna were stunning – and always with the great white cloud beckoning to the right.  The Yamuna is a classic oxbow, scouring out a huge plain, and leaving behind white earth/sand.  To the left there is a bridge; around it washing had been laid out to dry.

After the palace were the standard two Diwans of public and private audience.  Again, the Red Fort was dwarfed.  It look like some cross between a wooded mosque and Great Court Trinity.  And of course as with most architectures, there has been a constant interplay between sacred and secular.  In this Mughal style, the open air is a critical element.

The public Diwan was huge: a forest of pillars, yet retaining something of its origins in the ornate canopies it must have grown from.  The private Diwan was intimate in comparison, culminating in the tremendous backdrop of the river.  In the courtyard below, the grass had grown lush and a brilliant green.  Around it was the warm rosy stone; above it the hard blue Indian sky.  

Alongside was a small mosque; the Pearl Mosque remained closed.  In the great public Diwan, I felt for the first time near India, and in a foreign ancient land.  Perhaps the time of day helped, with huge, lengthening shadows; the mixed screeches of the grass green parrots and the chittering of the wild monkeys made it memorable, the day's declivity.  The air was hung with Indian scents, and warmth.

I left the fort feeling that I had arrived at last, that Agra was a key, and that the rest would fall into place.  My rickshaw man came to greet me – I had paid him nothing yet – and we went off for a ride through the city.  Or rather a push to begin with, since he had to walk us up the hill.  Old Agra is like those parts in Delhi.  Although everything is drab and dusty and squalid, I like it.  It seems to feel natural: the human equivalent of fractals.  Again I felt totally alien – I was a bit obvious in my shades, shorts and white t-shirt.  We passed all the usual things, plus a few new ones – like a TV repair school.  I wonder whether these streets are universal in India.  One factor which clearly does vary is the use of English.  Noticeable from the train was how Hindi predominated in small villages – but English abounded in Agra, often fractured.  Tomorrow, the Taj Mahal.

28.10.86 Agra 

The morning is warm, and the air clear.  About 9am I hire the same man as yesterday, but the whole day.  We agree on 20 Rs.  Once again, I am appalled by what I am doing.  More, I am appalled by the power I have through my money.  There is no doubt that power does corrupt, money is just the first step.

We arrive after a while at the Taj Mahal.  It is a long way – I am constantly amazed at how far everything is: Agra is so spread out.  From the outside you can see red towers through trees.  As you approach the main gate there is the first glimpse of white through the dark archway.  The white comes as a shock: after all the red stone its candour is disconcerting, ghostly.

Passing through the gateway and standing in its shadow, you get the full first impact of it.  I had expected to be disappointed: almost inevitably meeting an icon face-to-face is often disillusioning.  In this case, there was no disillusionment.  I had expected it to be rather small; it was grand and soaring.  I had expected it to be crowded round with oil refineries or cement works; it stood alone, with only its framing towers and the empty space of the river beyond.  I had expected it to shine with a kind of tinselly sheen like Sacre Coeur; but its surface seemed to be alive with constantly-changing gradations of white and pearl.

The setting was perfect.  As seems often to be the case, the formal gardens were well kept.  In particular, they were lush and green – the Indians seem not to stint with water, which in most countries is a precious luxury to be hoarded niggardly.  There were the same armies of thin men and women plucking at weeds one-by-one and watering each blade of grass.  This seems to be a very Indian solution to its employment:  divide up work to its tiniest unit, and share it out.  As a result, minuscule wages can be paid, and nobody need expend much of their little energy.

There was also water as a major element.  With the fountains turned off, the long artificial pool became a sliver of a mirror, with a phantom Taj within.  Walking towards the monument, I was impressed by the size: it is really big.  All pictures I have ever seen diminish it, make it a sugar confection.  The folly of trying to capture things with cameras.  Gradually the details as well as the overall form begin to emerge: the wild roulades of Arabic script around the frame of the main arch.  But with that an awareness of the four towers.  Take them away, and the Taj becomes a stumpy block on a slab; with them, the whole thing soars to heaven, powered by the towers' pinnacles, which echo the main dome.  And they also serve another purpose: standing at the head of the long pool, the line joining the two tips of the towers on each side meet almost exactly at the base of the arch in the centre.

The towers and the series or arches – the main one with its gentle point, echoed by smaller arches, two of which are seen at 45 degrees – are important, but it is the dome which defines the Taj.  At first, it looks like any other dome, yet there is something infinitely suggestive about it, something appropriately feminine.  Partly it is the gentle curves, culminating in the efflorescence at the top – just like a nipple.  For this is the Taj Mahal's secret: its dome is a perfectly-formed breast.  The breast of a young woman.

The marble itself is beautifully varied with mottling and variations.  This lends a sense of movement to the whole.  The inlays enhance this effect, giving elements of colour which seem to dance over the building.  Apart from the wild Arabic curlicues, the building's decoration is very restrained.  This is particularly so regarding the interior.  The formal coffins are again magnificently inlaid; around the room there is a frieze with yet more text – noticeable is how long horizontal lines flow through large sections of it.  Surrounding them was a fine marble screen, intricately carved.  The real tombs below were even more staid.

It seems that the outside is generally more important than the inside in these Islamic buildings, especially when the outside includes the sky.  So I went outside again and sat and looked.  The Taj itself is framed by the towers, and this ensemble by two further mosque-like buildings.  These are echoed in the middle of the garden, and the Taj Mahal itself is reflected in the huge entrance gate.

Apparently Shah Jahan had intended building another Taj for his own mausoleum, but in black marble, the dark image of his beloved Mumtaz.  The mind boggles.

All the while I was there, people offered to take my photo as if on Brighton beach.  I never fail to be amazed by this desire to have snaps of oneself with a building or landmark in the background.  Inevitably the latter is either invisible or out of scale.  Perhaps it just comes down to something to prove you've been there, as if some synecdoche of the experience were needed to justify the effort.  What of me, then – I who return from these forays empty-handed, but with a head full of memories?  I am regarded as a fool. Worse – nobody here believes me when I say I have no camera, they obviously think I am just trying to avoid paying extra.

Back to my little man outside.  The hill is so steep I get off the rickshaw.  I have to change hotels – inconvenient but not a great loss – I am not impressed by the Clarks Shiraz.   I have reserved at the Taj View – I hope.  It seems miles away.  From the outside it looks quite passable – and it has quite the most splendid commissionaire I have come across in India or elsewhere.  He is got up in brilliant red, is be-turbanned and has a good handlebar moustache.  He salutes grandiloquently as I arrive – a man of perception, obviously.

The hotel is quite good – or rather will be once they have finished it.  As the day wears on it is evident that a lot of work is still being done: the building echoes to a strange Varèse-like score or bangs and knocks and buzzes.  Unlike my father, I do not find this too distracting.  Besides it is cheaper than the Shiraz, and has a pool.

After my morning of culture I felt justified in indulging in a little hedonism around the pool.  Unfortunately, this too turned out to be in a state of flux and incompleteness.  Workmen were scurrying hither and thither.  There were no cushions for the sun-chairs, and the pool…  It was a soupy blue-green, and was already occupied by various animals, including something that looked like a cross-between a huge daddy-long legs, and a pond skater – except that it dived underwater.  Yet people still swam in it.  God knows what they will catch.  I contented myself with dipping in the sun, and was amazed to find myself sweating.  At times the sun really beat down; the difference from Delhi was marked.

After as much sun as I thought was good for me – physically and culturally – I went back into town.  By now, my little man was beginning to get fractious.  We went to the Cantonment station – I wanted to find out about ITDC tours to Fatehpur Sikri.  Since these were too brief I went to the bus station to get details of bus services there.  It was interesting to compare the two transport centres.

The station was touristy – touts everywhere, everything geared to parting people from their Rupees.  There was also flies everywhere.  In contrast, the bus station was local – even to the point of having nothing in English – and purely functional.  

To round off the day, I decided to go to Itmad-ud-Daula.  At this, my little man got really shirty.  He hadn't eaten all day, he said, and had had to pedal a lot (true).  I said I'd give him more – 25 Rs. - and he was appalled.  I said we'd agreed 20 Rs. For the whole day, and he said the rate was 70 or 80 Rs. For a day.  I felt on weak ground.  I tried haggling: 50 Rs., but he was having none of it.  I had to agree 60 Rs. And even this seemed paltry enough.

As we set off for what turned out to be a very long ride to Itmad-ud-Daula, I began to resent this scrawny little man, his greasy hair, threadbare clothes and weak little legs.  After all, he'd got off pretty lightly compared to his fellows: one of them had 10 schoolgirls in his rickshaw; but then again, maybe that's not so bad.  But this switch from guilt to anger – "it's not my fault, it's yours" – is common enough.  Another prerogative and pitfall of power.

As we preceded along seemingly endless streets of shops, all looking exactly the same, I tried once again to understand why, despite their griminess, they were still strangely attractive.  I decided it had to do with the fact that however ramshackle the building was, it was not some new prefab/breeze block job: it had grown organically.  Some were clearly quite old, with remnants of plaster work and mouldings.

Travelling along was also to travel in the land of smell.  India does smell, but not as I expected.  It is the smell of wood-smoke, incense, cooking, cow dung.

Apart from the embarrassment of forcing this poor man to cycle so far, I was also worried about my safety.  Time and again we narrowly missed oncoming traffic.  Everything stacks here: bullock carts are overtaken by rickshaws, who are overtaken by bicycles; they by scooters, and scooters by cars.  All at once, and the same on the other side.  Added to which, everyone cuts corners desperately, and the roads can be very rough, so you have the makings of a nightmare as far as inexperienced passengers are concerned.

It was around 4pm, and we hit the Agra rush hour; forget it, give my London any day.  Bullocks as ever were wandering around; how does anyone know who they belong to?  There were also a few goats.  We went down by the fort, and then towards the river.  There is a splendid Hungerford-type bridge over the Yamuna, a double-decker affair with a rail-track over the road.  According to an inscription, it was opened in 1907 or so, and toll-free.  The journey across it was equally precarious, with everyone overtaking everyone.

We made it to the other side, and were confronted by yet more shops, even poorer, if that is possible.  People were selling rolls of hay for horses, and bundles of sticks.  Wild-looking hairy pigs wandered freely.

As we arrived at Itmad-ud-Daula, I wondered whether it was worth it.  After all, I had seen the Taj Mahal – surely everything would be a disappointment after that?  In the event, it wasn't.  The memorial – which apparently was an influence on the Taj's architect – was quite different in effect.  It was smaller and much more intricate.  In form it consisted of the central building and four squat towers, joined by high walls.  In other words, this building did not soar like the Taj: instead, it had a rather minatory aspect, like a warrior's head peering over the battlements.  But what battlements.  The walls were minutely carved marble screens; elsewhere these were covered with colourful geometric patterns typical of Islamic architecture.  The overall effect was more immediately appealing and interesting than the Taj, though nowhere near so grand.  Inside was rather dull again, but the ceilings were splendid: scalloped forms of great complexity, though now sadly in decay.

But best of all was the setting, a jewel of a garden.  There was the same gate-house followed by a water course leading the eye to the monument.  There were the same flanking buildings.  And the same backdrop of the river.

Looking down from the terrace's considerable height, the river stretched out before me.  Below, a pig rooted around in the mud, on the opposite bank a herd of oxen were being driven home.  Back towards the bridge, on a huge white sandbank, a group of people worked by huge cans – washing perhaps?  Rows of sheets and clothes lay on the sand to dry.

As the shadows lengthened in this haven, there were the usual screeches of parrots, and monkeys darting back and forth, always with their terribly human movements.  I had seen some in Agra itself, looking like tiny guerrillas, stealthily penetrating the city.  We came back along the road underneath the walls of the fort, which reared up magnificently before us.  You would have to be mad to try to take it from here.  Rush hour had subsided, and in the cooling air glorious scents of grass and earth wafted to me.  

I finally paid off my little man, shamed into giving him 70 Rs.  This kind of power I could do without – I have a feeling you get hardened to it, as I was beginning to.  Not nice.

29.10.86 Agra 

A long, hot lazy morning by the pool  My day is complicated by the fact that I must check out by noon, though my train does not leave until 7pm.  I decide to go to Fatehpur Sikri – the hard way.  There is a tourist coach which leaves and returns too early, and spends too little time there.  Instead, I take the local bus, a mere 4.60 Rs. For an hour's journey.  The bus, like most other mechanical contraptions in India, is held together by pieces of string.  The seats are detachable, and metal edges are jagged.  I am slightly worried by the fact that there are no English signs on the bus: it could be going to Timbuktu for all I know. 

It isn't.  Instead, it is heading out across the totally flat, sandy landscape.  Most of India around here is flat – a bit like East Anglia, only bigger and drier.  We pass through a number of small villages, all looking much the same.  The bus hurtles along in the usual way, overtaking things that are overtaking other things.

Finally, a great curtain of wall hove into sight: Fatehpur Sikri.  This crazy place in the middle of nowhere was once a glorious capital.  Then it was abandoned, and has remained perfectly preserved, as a ghost city.  The village is as fly-blown as you can get.  Before visiting the city I had a Thums Up (sic) – currently my staple diet.  Black swirling masses of flies buzzed insanely around me.  After a few minutes of their endless irritations, I began to believe that they really were the devil's.

Fatehpur Sikri is placed impressively at the top of a hill – one of the few hills around here.  At one end, there is a huge mosque.  The main entrance is reached via one of the most impressive set of steps I know – huge treads, rising up steeply until at the top you are overpowered by the sheer face of the gate.  Despite cajolings by lads trying to get me to hire some overshoes for the mosque, I did not go.  Until I learn a little more about the finer points, all mosques are beginning to look the same to me.

Instead I went on to the city itself.  An embarrassing 1.50 Rs. to get in – less than 10p.  History, like everything else in India, comes cheap.  The first palace consisted of a large quad.  It was perfectly still, and that perfection was matched by the preservation of its buildings.  It was as if they had been built yesterday.  They gave a very strong sense of timelessness, of India the ancient.  And they were blissfully empty of people, so the magic was not broken.

Another thing which makes these Indian monuments so pleasant to wander around is the lack of supervision.  You can get practically everywhere, even to the most dangerous tops of towers.  There is none of this English nannying that we have.  

Round the back of this there was a huge colonnade courtyard, open on one side.  So many of these buildings bore striking resemblance to Oxbridge colleges.  Most of the rest of the buildings were in one large group.  They formed an amazing ensemble.  With their open towers and multi-platform construction, they looked like something out of Escher.  It really didn't matter that I had no idea what these things were.  Unfortunately it is hard to explain this to the importunate, uncomprehending guides whose services I spurned.  I want the experience to be unmediated, not pre-packaged in convenient tourist-sized gobbets.  And I want to move at my pace: even with personal guides there is no way to do this.  Some sights can only be understood by sitting and staring at them for half and hour.

Notable among the group of buildings was a five-storey tower – each storey smaller than the next, the whole effect being one of airy lightness.  The view from the top showed a huge flat plain to the horizon with occasional rocky hills.  One splendid and strange building had a central pillar capped by a platform which was joined by four walkways to the corners of the room.  The pillar was massively ornamented like a chandelier.  It was a wonderful folly.  Other notable elements were a human-sized playing board and a fountain garden with a central area.  Another small canopy had marble struts which made Bernini look staid.

Only one thing marred the overall effect of all this: the unremitting redness of the stone.  The characteristic red sandstone became oppressive.  In this country Chester cathedral is rather too much of a good thing; here it was a hundred times worse.  In a way it suited the heat and the sun.  Above all, it did partly explain why the Taj Mahal is such a shining impactful masterpiece: its whiteness is like a balm to sore, reddened eyes.

1986 India II: Kashmir
1986 India III: Jaipur, Udaipur


More destinations:

Thursday, 25 June 2020

1996 Vienna, Venice

Vienna 7.8.96

Donau Exhibition in the Schottenstift.  First room – very Peter Greenaway – a screen showing a bucket of water – in a bucket.  Pictures of the Ionian Sea.  Cliffs of Moher.  All slightly similar.  Beautiful space, showing the vaults of the church.  

Downstairs to the main exhibition: the sound of..."The Blue Danube".  Undine – set on the Donau – written by Friedrich de la Motte Fouqué. "Danu" = river.  A picture of Wien 1845 – surrounded by fields.  A panorama showing the Danube before it was brutally straightened.  Amazing map of 1696, with the Venetian Empire embracing the Adriatic coast.

1994 DDSG – "Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaft" - was closed down: originally it went al the way to the Levant.  Hebbel: "Österreich ist eine kleine Welt, in der die große ihre Probe hält."  "Melusina" – Grillparzer and Ludwig van Beethoven working together? A glass harmonica sounds eerily in the distance.  Interesting that after World War I, Austria was defined by what was left after creating all the other lands.  "Le reste, c'est Autriche".  In the slide show, with fine aerial photos of the bending river (and the isolated oxbows).

A moment of reflection.  My train arrived in Wien an hour late, so I have only about nine hours here, for which I'm paying about £120. But if I stayed the night, I'd just be another tourist (whereas in fact I'm a complete nutter).  Frighteningly long train from Rome to which our single carriage from Milan was added.  Slept reasonably well, although the air was in short supply at times.  Cappuccino and brioche on the train (good job I didn't wait).  In a way, I just wanted to show that it is possible to pop up to Wien for the day.  I also hope to hop out at Venice (at 4 in the morning) for one of those magic strolls at dawn.

Interesting collage of Austrian National anthems, including a strange Bundeshymne, marked "WAM".  On the other side, "Kompositionen und Klänge" – my kind of place this, deep in the heart of Vienna, with a collage of music, time to just think, to be… (Brahms' 4 on now…). Well, useful for me, but probably a little unsatisfactory for your average visitor.  Best bits the slide shows, confusing layout of the space, too – as I said to the PR lady – who thrust a catalogue on me, convinced that I was about to write all this up.  I don't think I was dishonest – I just showed my Press Card…

Anyway, in the slightly cool air (nice for walking), along to the old Trześniewski – which, I'm sorry to say, has added some glitz – albeit minimal – in the form of boring incitements to try out its various delights.  Which are still good.  Then along to the nearby music shop, looking for Mozart's "Così, così", which seems not to exist (should be in the Viennese version of Don Giovanni).  Must be from a parallel universe (the owner checked in the Köchel Verzeichnis – could only find "Così: due paroline" from "L'Oca del Cairo", and so refused to believe it existed.

Then down Kärntner Straße - rather tawdry with all its tourists.  I return to the bookshop that I went in a couple of years ago – and regretted not buying the Rilke volume (Suhrkamp?).  They didn't have it this time.  Went into EMI Austria next door: rubbish at outrageous prices.  As I left, a pigeon got me from on high.  I now have some fine stains on my "clean" t-shirt.

Sitting in the café of the Kunsthalle, where I came before.  Aiming to wander out to the Karlskirche, one of my favourites.  There now: it has lost its scaffolding and can be seen in (nearly) all of its glory.  U-bahn to Stephansplatz.  Wandering into a bookshop with lots of linguistic books (Baltische Sprachen, Alte aramäische Sprache etc.) and Colloquial Basque (in English) – yummy…

Now in Peterskirche – the first time here, I think.  Very kaiserlich und königlich it seems to me – old gilt, ochre walls.  Looking in a few more bookshops, took a trip down to the Westbahnhof (on the U3 – "my" U-bahn, since I was here on the day it opened).  It's much more parochial – going West – nothing so romantic as the Südbahnhof, with all the wonderfully evocative names – and that Drang nach Osten…

Taking U-bahn back, and then S1 rail service (which always worries me for some reason – I never feel that I'm going where I want to), back to find Rosenkavalier restaurant at the Südbahnhof.  No Gulaschsuppe this time, but Wiener Schnitzel + Vöslauer Wasser with Hundertwasser's characteristic label.

On the train – 418/34, as before.  But now we have a family of three – mother, five-to-six year old son, three-to-four year old daughter – who are ethnic Chinese, but come from Calcutta, and now live in Wien… How complicated it all becomes.  Also present an exaggeratedly-leggy young woman of indeterminate nationality.  Taller than me…  Just as a point of reference, the leggy is Slovenian… Nope, sorry, not Slovenian, Slovak – and a model to boot, en route to Calabria.  The Chinese woman also speaks English – and Hindi: what a polyglot lot we are in here tonight… Although these kids are driving me nuts (as is the model's smoking, albeit in the corridor), it is an interesting microcosm of the future.  Where everyone speaks several languages and drops from one into the other…

Venice 8.8.96

On the Fondamenta Diedo, walking through a silent, deserted Venice at 4 in the morning.  Air balmy.  Cats miaow distantly, boats' ropes creak, water drips.  Overhead, a sliver of moon dodges in and out of the clouds.  Selig

In Piazza San Marco – alone.  Raining slightly now – air very humid.  The sky lightening gradually.  Faint sounds of the dawn chorus – and of refrigerator units.  A beetle crawls on the step beneath me.  Down by the gondolas, which thrash like so many startled cows as the waves from the vaporetto slap their bottoms.

Light now (6am), in Campo Santa Maria Formosa; they have put out chairs and tables in the square (shocking).  I wonder (always) who owns the ruined but fine palazzo opposite the church.  A story there surely.  Past the forestiera – lights in the main hall.  Now at Santi Giovanni e Paolo.  Everywhere in the city there is the smell of fresh-baked bread.

The sky quite leaden now, with a strange line in the sky, as if it had been cut with a knife and sewn up.  Eight o'clock, and I'm a wee bit stanchino.  Thunders growl and some bright flashes of lightning fork to the east.  The wind is getting up: it'll rain.  Time for another breakfast…

It is now utterly bucketing down – I have taken refuge in the Bar Ristorante Da Gino (ciao!, Gino…), just a few steps from "our" restaurant, "Ai Cugniai".  I hope this rain burns itself out in the next 30 minutes, or I am stuffed (a statement that begs for the following sentence: "yes, I am stuffed…").  Vedremo.

Imagining a world without Venice is like imagining one without Mozart.  But this is daft: imagine a world without Mozart's 63rd, 74th and 99th symphonies, or the late operas – "Die Gesellschaft", "Immer die Liebe" and "Amletto" – or his amazing late string quartets inspired by Beethoven's Rasumovsky set (and what a pity Beethoven died so tragically young – imagine what symphonies and piano sonatas he might have produced…)

What's nice about these bars is the sense of family – as well as Gino, it's all first-name terms here.  Pity they are smoke like the proverbial.

Re-reading the Siena Days in this notebook, I am struck by my double privilege: not just to have seen these things wonderful things, but to have returned to them.  The joy of recognition, re-discovery and new discovery.  The same, of course, with Venice, which I have visited perhaps ten times now.  But all the more important to stay here only a few days, lest it become familiar and lose its glorious improbability.

Gino sings quietly behind the bar.

To the Palazzo Grassi, "I Greci dell'Occidente".  Interesting distinction between colonisation and founding (metropolis = mother-city).  Greeks brought the polis – city – with them.  Amazing the tribes that we know of early Italy: Sikans, Sisidi, Elinians, Ausonians, etc.  Nice oath of the Greeks with the Sicels: "As long as they trod on this earth and had heads on their shoulders" – but they put earth in their shoes and garlic heads hidden in clothing on the shoulders…

The origins of the Doric order: triglyph may have been decorative ends, but mutules were a reflexion of older structures.  Wonderful: the angle conflict of corner triglyphs.  The origin of the temple – oikos (home/hearth).  The link between colonies and the development of classic architecture = propaganda = civic architecture.

The Temple of Apollo at Syracuse – first monument entirely in stone.  Wonderful metope with Odysseus and Alcyoneus (550BC).  Goethe on the Selinous temples: "oppressive and almost terrifying".  Selinous – wow.  Manifestation of town planning because aligned with the town.  Syracuse – 733BC – its street plan is used to this day.  Interesting how close Thucydides is to all this.

Money was mostly used to pay mercenaries.  Each city had its own weights systems – which made commerce difficult.  Greek tyrants affirmed rule with public works – pushed Agrigento  to do the same.  And of course, the colour of the ceramics.  The Ionic order, especially at Metaponto, all about Athens vs. Sicily.  This war destroyed Athens and its empire.

Amazing diagrams using coloured blocks to show ratios of various parts of the temple – the issue of why is one more beautiful than another – if maths is the basis of beauty.  Town planning at Naxos (Sicily).  Wonderful all the dubious stories and opinions on the Boston ThroneSybaris = Sybaritic = decadence.  Description of enforced deportations, return of citizens – like Bosnia.  Hippodamus of Miletus – urban theoretician, urban blocks.  The change in theatrical masks from variable to fixed.  The catapult was invented at Syracuse.  Colours used to articulate architecture: red for horizontal, blue for vertical.  The Mausoleum at Halicarnassus is like Étienne-Louis Boullée

Since I have missed the 11 o'clock train and there isn't one at 12.06, I may as well luxuriate in the sunny (and increasingly touristy-filled) Venice.  To the Caffè di Torino – but not for chocolate this time: for tramezzini.

Although I was not particularly impressed by the background "info" on the exhibition, I think that I can say that I learnt more from this than most others I have ever been to (with the emphasis on learning).  That is, it taught me both about the roots of Classicism, and also the end of Athens, and how Sicily/Syracuse are central to this.  I can see how to tie together many elements from this.

The exhibition really was excellent – everything that the Danube one, alas, was not: well organised, easy to follow, rich, attractive to look at, and ultimately revelatory.  Walking back to the Ferrovie dello Stato  station I somehow ended up near the Piazzale Roma – very strange how the landscape changes there, with trees and roads – a real few hundred metres of transition – palpable.

Now on the extremely comfortable Zurich train (I'm almost tempted…), which is pleasantly empty at the moment.  Parenthetically, it seems that I have been quite prescient all these years in using the @ sign in my notebooks instead of writing "at"…  I did notice, though, that there is an interesting exhibition in Trieste – of Czech-held Venetian paintings.  I quite fancy seeing Trieste in winter...

More destinations:

Saturday, 20 June 2020

1988 Venice

Venice 1.1.88

My fourth trip. Venice is like memory: full of twists, sudden open spaces, sudden unknown views, dead ends. Sitting in the Ristorante Ponte di Rialto, I see the chef start preparing the pizzas for the evening.  An almost sensual experience as he rolls, breaks and moulds the wet clinging dough.  It looks alive, proto-human.  Typically, this is acted out at the front, in full view of the world  the Italians ever the actors and show-offs.  The gondolieri row from the waist: they lunge into the oar, doubling up.  The most striking thing about the Rialto bridge is how tacky it is – the wooden boards in winter look like an old railway arch.

The Rialto area is unusual in that there are fairly broad promenades each side of the canal.  Normally the water is only glimpsed along rii, or at a dead-end alley.  The Grand Canal is almost a secret place.  The paradox of memory: that you only remember how good things were in retrospect.  At the time the details get in the way, or you are not aware of an event's significance.  Gondolieri are like taxi drivers: they pull out in front of traffic with sublime disdain.  To be in Venice for the first time is like recalling a memory you never had.

From Rialto to Campo Santa Margarita – via Santa Maria dei Frari – as amazing as ever.  Campo Santa Margarita was also as strangely moving as before: its suddenness, its size.  I went there to find a café: closed, alas.  But further on in the campo an even smaller, more intimate one nestled.  I entered to growled but friendly Venetian accents.  The cappuccino, like all first cappuccini in winter, was ambrosia.  

Then along the Calle Lunga Santa Barbara to the Fondamenta Zattere Al Ponte Lungo, to the Church of Santa Maria del Rosario (Gesuati).  Again, curious to have one long path, and to be walking along the water.  Odd too to have the ghostly vision of Giudecca floating opposite, punctuated by Palladian churches.  Finally along to the Peggy Guggenheim gallery.  More thoughts on memory: in the middle of the gallery, photos of Peggy, with Henry Moore etc.  A gallery to her memory, in fact.

San Michele enshrines another sort of memorialisation.  Fondamente dei Mendicanti – a floating crib lit by a lurid green light – by the Ospedale Civile, with its internal landing bay for ambulance boats.  When in Venice, it is hard to remember we are there, in the only Venice.  In search of dinner, I went east.  I entered Piazza San Marco for the first time on this trip: my spirits rose at the huge open space, the tiers of white lamps like ribbons of light, and at the end, the great bubbly mass of San Marco itself. It is simply the most exuberant building in Venice.  And next to it, like a sentinel, the gentlemanly campanile.

I struck out into the backstreets; my goal, Santa Maria Formosa.  My feet moved half hesitating, half hurrying.  At each turn, views would strike me with a strange familiarity.  I crossed a bridge, and there in front of me was Santa Maria Formosa herself.  In remembrance of my first last meal in Venice, I ate in the restaurant nearby.  It seems to have moved up market.  The service was rather surly, but the food was quite good.

Campo Santa Maria Formosa was dark and quiet; even my old corner café had shut up shop.  I moved on, in the only direction possible. And there it was, the forestiera at the angle of the canal, by the bridge.  It was bigger than I remembered, but otherwise – again – looked unchanged.  Lights were streaming through the leaded panes of the main living room; I could see the beams of the roof and some mouldings on the wall.  Walking round to the left, I could make out the crude strip-lighting by the door to the men's dormitories.  I half expected to see myself staring out at this doppelgänger.

Thereafter I just wandered.  Venice at night is not the same as Venice by day: it is even less knowable.  The canals become invisible, just gaps in space; landmarks lurk in darkness.  There are pools of light under the lamps, islands.  There are very few people in the backstreets; everything is anonymous and deathly.

I ended up on the north side of Venice, opposite San Michele, whose cypresses could just be made out.  I passed down the Fondamente dei Mendicanti, past the garish floating crib, down to Santi Giovanni e Paolo, with the Colleoni statue high on its plinth.  Monuments, public memorials – art and the world is littered with them.

Thence a circuitous wander till I came to San Zuliano – the first time I have seen this, or noticed it; a fine facade, unusually placed in its own tiny campo.  Passing the cinema of San Zuliano, I heard the film "Opera" rolling: the projectionist's room gave straight onto the street.

Back in Piazza San Marco – again, with the past and memory pushing me on, there was only one way to go, to the piazzetta, to sit under the lion.  Except that the lion was not there.  His column was, certainly, but Venice's symbol had gone for a walk.  Disconcerting for memory to be thwarted so brutally in this way.  Sitting there, San Giorgio Maggiore was, happily, as stunning as ever.  But even this had changed subtly now.  I had read up Palladio's works; now Le Zitelle and Redentore – both lit up on Giudecca – entered my mental field around him.  I had been corrupted by knowledge and with it, my memories.

I wandered along towards Santa Maria Della Salute, looking grand floodlit.  Back through Piazza San Marco, past Florian's – which I'd never noticed before; it looked very pretentious – I must go in.  Then out along the Riva degli Schiavoni, past Vivaldi's church (we have Goldoni's two accounts of Vivaldi in his "memoirs", yet we know practically nothing of Vivaldi – except his music).  Out towards the funfair (dead), back to the hotel after another session under the lionless column, looking at Piazza San Marco in the sodium glare.  Somebody was letting off very lewd firecrackers.  Back to room 89, listening to Brahms organ music and motets, plus some jazz – all very late-night music.

2.1.88 Venice

Following the itineraries from Lorenzetti's astonishing book does have the advantage that you go places you would never have found: the feet have memories too, and tend to take the same tracks.  For example, Calle Goldoni, and Ponte Goldoni.  From the bridge there are myriad paths and canals.  Corte Grimani, looking back to Ponte Tron, I will remember this for Goldoni's sake.  Campo San Luca – a small, attractive, gratuitous place.

Along Riva del Carbon: Ca' Loredan.  Campo San Benedetto – small, but powerful: hidden by a nondescript building.  Adjacent to it, Palazzo Martinengo – a pediment of a church eats into it.  Opposite, the huge Palazzo Pesaro, some of its gothic windows bricked up.  All rather sad.

Amazing wooden staircase to the inside of Museo Fortuny: huge old oak beams.  Within: empty – I had to knock up the custodian.  To enter is to step back hundreds of years.  Everything on the first floor is hither and thither: Moorish helmets by the front door – with its typical round, leaded windows.  The exhibition seems to be revealing a studio – presumably of some Spanish painter of the early part of the century: there are monumental casts, huge lights with reflectors, lots of small oils, an enormous set of steps – for painting? - rich costumes – for historical scenes?  On the walls, thick hangings.

It is crazy.  Like a film-set, an old attic, a forgotten world, a memory.  I don't understand the place; and like Venice, I don't want to.  With only a few hints I can create my own meaning which is far richer.  There are signs – copies of Tiepolo, a quaint artist's settle with built-in easel.  But how can I have memories of this rich chaos?  It is like the Grand Canal: I may recognise it, have memories of it, but how except through years of familiarity can I ever get to know every moulding, pillar and arch?

One room is done out like a garden pavilion, with grottoes and views of distant country scenes.  In Venice you forget there is grass or countryside: this world takes over.  In the corner of this room there is a simple Duchamp-like basin with a crude tap.  All around it, there are daubs of old paint, as if in some de Kooning piece.  Above it, randomly, a dried ram's head made of clay.

Another theme is naked women disporting themselves.  They are young and beautiful; what memories did they hold for the painter and models when both were old?  Curious lamps hang from the ceiling: they look like Damascened shields, but are made of cloth.  The air is chill, and the faint stench of old Venice hangs over the scene.

One picture seems to be of the rooms: it shows an artist's studio, hangings everywhere – as in this exhibition.  Light streams in through an open window.  In the corner, there is a painting of a grey-bearded man, painting.  Among the casts there are two (!) of the death mask of Wagner.  None of this is labelled, but this is what cultural memories are for.  Other casts includes the Belvedere torso.  The Wagner is disturbing in its reality, its implicit outrage of the dead, helpless face.  At the other end, more naked ladies.  None of the paintings is signed.  Modesty or arrogance?

In a room marked "security exit", strange machinery.  A huge model of a domed theatre with amphitheatre-like seating.  Two strange devices, halfway between dynamos, phonographs and god knows what (theatre lighting systems?).  One painting signed: M Fortuny Madrazo: why the sudden weakness?  What did his wife – or any painter's wife – think of all his voluptuous nudes? The man locks up after I am gone.  A world closed.

Near the Grand Canal, the small bridges offer tantalising glimpses.  For example, Ponte de l'Albero: I can see a palace and glimpses of vaporetti and gondolas.  Images like life: partial, evanescent. One advantage of Lorenzetti is that he takes you every inch of the way: not just the hot spots.  Campiello nuovo e dei monti is odd – it is raised, probably because it was a churchyard.  What of all those buried here?

Piscina San Samuele.  Palazzo Querini - 15th century, but decrepit and easily missed.  A tablet to Francesco Querini (d. 1904), an Arctic explorer who died there.  A shocking sign: "Autoscuole Europe": uh?  Salizzada San Samuele: Veronese's house; could have been built in the 19th century, judging by its appearance.

Calle de le Carrozze - 10th century well head – Byzantine.  Campanile of San Samuele – a shock to see such Romanesque work: good clean lines, unflustered.  Reminds me of the church near Les Deux Magots in Paris.  Corte del Duca Sforza on the edge of the Grand Canal.  A two-person gondola-skiff – one gondoliere and a young lady.  Earlier, I saw what looked like a racing four-man gondola charging down the Grand Canal. Fondamenta della Scuola: "divieto di nuoto" – in the water?

Calle de Teatro, non c'e'Santo Stefano, glimpsed as it shuts (11.30am): unfortunately the rest of the world takes no account of Lorenzetti.  Campo Sant'Anzolo (=Angelo).  Cimarosa's land.  Many fine palazzi, brooding over all, Santo Stefano's leaning tower… Ponte Storto – another quirky corner: Calle Caortorta, giving on to the back of La Fenice.  San Fantino – Lorenzetti lovingly lists everything – including the only work of one Cesare delle Ninfe; his memory lives on.  

When we travel with someone, it is almost as a custodian and validator of our memories.  "Do you remember…?" we can say to prove our own memories have an objective existence.  This is why spouses, lovers and friends are so important: it is the old philosophical idea of our knowledge – like god's – creating the world.  Without fellow memories we are condemned to lonely solipsism.

The Palazzo Contarini del Bovolo is striking.  The spiral staircase looks quite new compared to the surrounding flaking walls and general squalor.

Walking with Lorenzetti is not easy; he is a perfectionist, a pedant, an enthusiast.  Sometimes you lose him as he dashes off down some tiny side alley while you are admiring the view.  He is inconsiderate: opening times, the difficulties, the audacities of seeing some of his objects, are great.  Like most people in love, he presumes a great deal, and is not really interested in your opinions, only your assent. (San Lorenzo on his griddle in the Gesuati – like Lorenzetti on his griddle of streets, all of us with the network of our memory…).

The diary is the ultimate recourse against oblivion.  But at its heart is a paradox: the more we write, the less we do.  Art at least allows us to be selective, heightening here, forgetting there.  But diarists like Pepys are something else: why did he do it?

Leaving someone close is like amnesia – voluntary or imposed: we lose great chunks of our past with them.  Perhaps this is why couples stay together long after affection keeps them that way naturally: to part would be to destroy their past as well as their relationship.  To leave requires a sense of optimism – which why the young do it far more easily than the old.

I have very few memories before Cambridge; thereafter I have developed an almost photographic recall of places I have visited. Food too can bring back the memories.  I am now eating fegato alla veneziana: it brings back vivid memories of when I ate this in Rome, just down from St. Peter's, two years ago.  

As in all this, time is relative.  A relationship may proceed so slowly, amount to so little, that seven years is less than seven months of an intense, experienced-packed affair.  Some people seem to have done nothing in their decades; others have lived – and suffered – a lifetime in a year.  Trips are the same: months in a city may teach less than a few days.  

On the Lorenzetti trail again – past San Moisè – definitely one of the most memorable facades – wild over-the-top Baroque, all swags and wild columns.  The soot and grime seem appropriate – so biased are we in our appreciation of the past.  Down the Calle del Teatro San Moisè – which opened with Monteverdi's "Arianna" – mostly lost.

Santa Maria del Giglio, or Santa Maria Zobenigo – a family extinct in the 12th century.  Santa Maria Zobenigo – very Bramante, especially the exterior, with its rounded braces – to the memory of the Barbaro family – four statues on the facade and maps and reliefs of various cities.  Inside, a fine organ case with instruments – reminds me of St Michan's in Dublin.  Wildly baroque side altars with rounded, broken encrusted pediments.  Rather horrible.  Rubens in the sacristy – he doesn't belong in Venice.  San Maurizio knocked down and re-built with a different orientation – so much for the past…

I stand on the Accademia Bridge; again.  To my left, there is that garden as shockingly green as ever; to my right, the Accademia.  I can count 19 palazzi from here to Santa Maria della Salute; but I may be wrong.  In any case, what do I know of them?  All I will remember is the idea of the Grand Canal, details will go.

Rio Terrà Foscarini is strange because it reaches from one side of the water to the other and is straight – an old canal that was filled in.  Gesuati not yet open – the world ignoring Lorenzetti again.  So across to Giudecca.

The old vaporetto is no longer as cheap as I recalled it – L.1500.  It is also rather disconcerting crossing the old Canale della Giudecca – is seems so far – again, I recall my last trip to Venice – when I took Linea No. 5 – all the way out to Murano and nearly missed my plane – vaporettos are like that: they have a mind of their own.

Walking along the fondamente of Giudecca is strange: across the way lies the real Venice – this is some kind of ghostly double.  And the Canale looks horribly magnified, as if the two sides are drifting apart.  To a café, just by Il Redentore.  This is none of your posy jobs: this is more Glaswegian minimalism.  Full of old men with thick glasses, stern-looking women, mad-looking ones clutching huge blue boxes.  On the wall, there is a technicolour photo of San Giorgio Maggiore, a faded print of Italy's football squad, a pennant for Florence, a still-life oil painting.  I drink yet another cappuccino – the taste of Italy.

Buonarroti lived on Giudecca when in exile from Florence, 1529: "per vivere solitario".  Il Redentore – built in commemoration of deliverance from the plague.  Facade very like San Giorgio Maggiore – but cooler, not so violent and thrusting.  From its steps it is particularly impressive – the edges of the pediments catching the shadows.  I enter and find Italian hymns playing.  It is probably appropriate.  The interior is much more lived-in than San Giorgio Maggiore: lots of candles, lamps, candles; and at this time of year, a presepio with the characters in 18th century garb.  It is dark and hard to make out Palladio's design.  Perhaps you really need faith to appreciate this church, whereas San Giorgio Maggiore is more purely aesthetic.  Churches are difficult: can we seem them truly as just works of art?  If not, what are atheists to do?

The view from the steps is wonderful: the sky is darkening, and the pink lights line Zattere and the Riva degli Schiavoni.  San Giorgio Maggiore is gradually glowing with its cool light. Zitelle is closed, but looks half-realised – not echt Palladio.  But the view from here is something else.  The bells are ringing: not single peals, but four notes.  San Marco is lit up, but half-obscured; La Dogana shines with its golden ball; La Salute rises proud at the end of the Grand Canal; Ospedale della Pietà visible too.

Vaporetto No. 5 back – rather worrying in its long, circuitous way.  To the Gesuati.  It turns out to be a real theatre of a church – very dark (at 5.30pm), with the altar and baldacchino black and brooding.  Tiepolos on the ceiling.  Unlike Redentore which jars in places, this feels of a piece.

I have seen so many churches today: how can the memory retain them all separately?  What will my memories be?  Compare looking at a room full of Jackson Pollocks at the Guggenheim (again): how do we look at them and remember them?  At least the churches have conventional figures, standard designs; what do we do with modern art, which has neither, and which tends to invent everything as it goes along?  There is interesting evidence on how we look at a painting's image: we jump around from salient point to salient point – a bit like a guided tour, moving continuously along a route, but stopping at the highlights.  All our memories are therefore journeys through a sequence of images, and past key points in those images.

Back to the hotel, past an antiquarian print shop.  I enter, and ask about views of Santa Maria Formosa.  They have two: the same, but first and second impressions, separated by a century.  £350 one, £175 the other.  The image is very simple: of the church and that end of the campo.  Quite effective.  I am sorely tempted… vediamo.

Eats at a nicely informal pizzeria Al Teatro Goldoni – which is precisely where I am now, to see – and possibly even hear – "Le donne gelose" by Goldoni himself in the theatre, which is just a few metres away.  Let's hope it is not entirely in Venetian dialect.  Curiously, the seats are not numbered.  This means that there is a huge, disorganised scrum to get a ticket, and then another pell-mell to get a seat.  I find myself in row G, on the end of the central block to the left (G11?).

The interior of the theatre itself is a curious mish-mash.  It is modern, with tolerably spacious seats – my father would approve – but the boxes above have an old-fashioned air about them.  The seats are rust-coloured, the walls of the boxes a horrible green.  The ceiling has the requisite chandelier (small), and a strangely oriental design.  Amazingly, there are no programmes; help.  A fairly small proscenium stage, with minimal set.

Alla fine del primo tempo – yes, well, it's almost "A Life for the Tsar" time: that is, I'm having to guess most of it as I did in Moscow when watching Glinka's opera in the Bolshoi all those years ago.  The dialect is very attractive to the ear – just incomprehensible save for the occasional word.  I shall not even try to guess the plot.  I will note though that people are not laughing very much – confirming my worst suspicions that Carlo is not a laugh a minute, whether in English or Italian.  The best bits come from the integration of the commedia dell'arte with the action.  The set is dull, the acting very static.  I am confused by the total emptiness of the boxes in the theatre.

The stones of Venice are a huge palimpsest, even though the city is not.  Everyone feels obliged to say "I was here".  On the Rialto bridge, there is one dated 1/1/88; and another which says "1915" – but no name; the span of graffiti is no doubt greater.  

Venice divides up according to the section of the Canal Grande: Rialto to Accademia etc.  The secret parts of Venice: just along from the contrapuntal Santi Apostoli; along the totally horrible Strada Nova – even worse with its Xmas lights, there is a tiny, dark alley, Ramo Dragan, which comes out under a low entrance to a jetty.  From here the Canal Grande curves away strongly to the Rialto, and round to Ca' Rezzonico and Ca d'Oro.  Opposite there is a fondamenta; it is completely empty now.  Magic.

Everywhere in Italy you get bill posting to the memory of the dead: "e' mancato all'affetto dei suoi cari…"  Passing Santi Apostoli – amazing, slow chant – but neither Gregorian nor anything else I know…

More secret parts: Campiello dei Miracoli; Ponte de le Erbe – three bridges visible, totally nowhere. Ultimo numero del Sestiere del Castello: 6828 (ha!).  So many secret places: Ponte del Piovan o del volto; rii split, bridges, back of churches.  Miracoli (again).  This has the makings of a nightmare; or like a memory which will not come back.  As I walk round and round, I have the image of another Italian city; I cross cobbled streets to a large square, brightly lit; Rome? It will not come back, even though I walk into this square again and again.  Then I find myself where I started, near the Rialto.

The second half of the Goldoni was better in some ways; the scene at night, everyone masked, was atmospheric and strangely moving.  I still could not understand what was going on; but I could take it metaphorically: maskers, confused groping, mistaken identities.  This is the cancellation of the past and memory – compare the Carnevale in Venice.

There are various stages to remembering a language: first the words themselves come back, the the ability to string them together.  Finally, you can begin to understand speech; the last phase is coping with dialect.

The Lorenzetti walks are becoming atolls of knowledge: when I come across a familiar street, I feel safe.  Certainly his itineraries divide up Venice.  What of Ruskin's "Stones of Venice"?  I have seen so many churches today; how can I remember them? How can I remember the Jackson Pollocks?

3.1.88 Venice

It's raining.  The streets and campi reflect the buildings around them. It is as if they remember their original state of water.  Venice is not designed for umbrellas: its streets are too narrow, and they stop you from taking in the view.

To the Accademia.  More changes: no free admission for journos.  A new law of 1985; how time flies.  So I pay the L.4000 and find myself face-to-face with Paolo Veneziano… At the left-hand base of the picture, two tiny people: due devoti, muscling in.  Room IV: a wonderfully stern San Girolamo – with yet another devoto (no wonder San Girolamo looks so miffed).  In the Piero della Francesca room.  The green of the hills that characteristic ochre (how do we remember colours? - it is like perfect pitch).

Room V: Giorgione's "La vecchia" with her scroll of "Col tempo" attains its sadness through the eyes.  The eyes which look at us, look at herself in a mirror: she sees this scraggy face and old body – but the continuity of her consciousness means that she cannot relate it to her self-image which is of the past.  It is as if the box we live in grows old, while the spirit inside does not.

Part of the richness of "La Tempesta" for us is in its mystery.  We cannot read it like some religious scene; it is romantic in its self-completeness.  So how can we look at it?  At the elements – the woman, the man, the lightning, the distant town, the broken pillars, the separating stream – or we can construct our own story, a path through the picture.  One thing is certain, it lives in the memory because of its magic.

Veronese's "The Feast in the House of Levi" dominates Room X; it is so vast. I know this painting, and yet I have never seen the dwarf by the stairs before, nor the gilt sculptures above the arches.  We trust that paintings and places do not change in the interim; but of course we have no proof…  There are – as near as I can tell – 64 people in this painting: how can I remember them?  What do I remember?

We must pass through a gallery as through Venice: picking certain routes, certain stopping point.  Otherwise everything becomes an undifferentiated blur.  Room XVII is one of the best: therein are contained the views of Venice by people like Giovanni Migliaia, Canaletto, Grandi.  It is the shock of recognition: Bernardo Bellotto's "Scuola di San Marco by SS. Giovannai e Paolo", Guardi's "San Giorgio Maggiore" – with the old campanile, thinner and taller.  

The wonderfully soft yet strong portraits of Rosalba Carriera, the paintings of Pietro Longhi – surely the real chronicler of Venice.  Room XX: the Gentile Bellini procession in front of San Marco – hundreds of people.   The changes and the continuity with the image today.  Past the little Madonna on the stairs.  I buy a postcard of part of "La Tempesta".  The bells are ringing clangorously in Santa Maria della Salute: how can I capture the moment?  A passing ship in the Canale della Giudecca sounds its horn – in tune with the bells.

Santa Maria della Salute is almost perfect; this may be because it represents the life-work of one man, Longhena.  The octagonal form is inspired: it is so gracious and airy; then the presbiterio, opening out again, out-tops even this antechamber.  The space beyond the altar extends this volume.  Again memory fails me: the cool white and grey of the main space reminds me of somewhere, but I can't think where.  Like so much of Venice, this place is a fractal (sic): you can home in at deeper and deeper levels, and find more and more detail.  For example, the altar, with its powerful baroque sculpture – almost Bernini.

I find myself in Caffè Florian; I noticed just along from here is a shop called Jesurum – I immediately thought of John Jesurun.  Now I sit in the window, with views of a wet and cold Piazza San Marco.  I have ordered cappuccino and a small cake; the bill, I notice, is a mere L.9,800 – just under £5.  This reminds me of my most expensive cup of coffee: it was in the Guggenheim Museum in New York. The pound was at its all-time low – about $1.15, and the coffee cost $2.  Yikes.  This seems more justified, because expected.

What can I say about this place?  I have never been here, so it is a new experience, a new memory.  It consists of three or so shallow rooms.  They are elaborately decorated with middle-eastern images of coffee et al.  The ceiling too retains an Islamic, oriental element.  All the walls are covered with glass, which with the old fading mirrors add an air of being in a museum – or a goldfish bowl.  The art deco lamps are help by bronze putti.  The seat is plush red velvet.

Why am I here?  Why are any of us here?  The tourists, no doubt, because it is famous: one more experience to tick off the list.  This is partly why I am here (partly?).  It is pleasant, to be sure, but £5 pleasant?  So is my response here any different from tourists in front of "La Tempesta"? At least I am conscious of what I am doing; though I would be pressed to find any better justification for it.

The music which acts as ampoules of the past is nearly always pop.  This is a for a good reason: the very greatest music says too much by itself - to accommodate yet more layers of meaning either does violence to the music, or it is simply overwhelmed.  But most pop is essentially trivial, and is the perfect vehicle for memories.  For the same reason, third-rate classical music like Albinoni's Adagio etc., will also do.  For me, I am reduced to a snivelling emotional wreck when I hear certain tracks from Supertramp's "Breakfast in America", Joni Mitchell's "Blue" and Sade's "Smooth operator"…

Writing is a journey: a path from the first sentence to the last.  Of course, you can jump, like taking short cuts; but this only takes you to another part of the loop: we are locked in the sentence's unidirectional linearity.  This writing mimics in part my walks: ideas and impressions are the sights and sounds. We contain within us our memories as one long journey: of our body.  It is as if a camera is running all our waking (and dreaming) hours; the camera is mounted in this strange device, which perambulates the world.

When we walk these unfamiliar or barely familiar scenes, choosing left or right for whatever reasons, there is a kind of determinism at work: whatever made us go left at this spot before is likely to affect us in the same way next time.  This presupposes a degree of constancy in the surroundings which will enable the same forces to work on us.  Venice, pre-eminently, offers that.

Looking in a libreria, I see a poster of the views of Venice.  They are the same as those I saw yesterday; apparently this is a definite series.  They are by two artists: Canaletto and Vetterini (I think – my memory is too short term), published in 1740-ish.  

With Lorenzetti again.  Inevitably, perhaps, his itineraries tend to start in Piazza San Marco.  As a result, you must move with the crowds for a while.  So, moving along Merceria di San Salvatore is a pain; turning down the tiny Calle dei Stagneri O de la Fava is a relief.  Across the Ponte de la Fava, there is a typically cut-off church, a very bare brick facade which reminds me of Gerona.  It is not often that the narrow winding streets become claustrophobic, because they are normally inhabited, there are windows and doors.  Calle Ramo Drio la Fava is different: it sidles past Santa Maria della Fava, whose steep wall bears down on you.  

To Campo San Lio.  Another delightful campo which I have never seen before; or have I?  It is like a game of deceit practised by a city.  To Campo Santa Maria – though only a few hundred metres from Piazza San Marco, I have never seen this in my trips to Venice.  Ponte del Cristo.  Three canals meet at a right angle; down the smaller, two bridges; the larger moves away grandly.  (Whilst admiring a stunning black-haired young lady mouthing beautiful gravelly noises down the phone in Campo Santa Maria, I put my foot in a juicy one: the first time on this trip – and how apt…) Fondamenta dell'erbe: traditionally a pictorial viewpoint (I saw a postcard of it today).  Attractive Gothic palazzo at the end of the fondamenta.  Beautiful carved wooden door.  

I had not expected to see Santa Maria dei Miracoli so soon.  Last night, when I came across it twice, it seemed miles from anywhere, as if it were one of those places which we can only find late at night, or in exceptional circumstances – as in "Le Grand Meaulnes".  But here it was, sitting by the side of a small canal.

Inside is even more amazing: jewel-like is the only description for the tiny details of the place.  Rich grey marble facing the walls of the nave, veined like blue cheese, make the whole surface bubbling and alive.  The design is unusual:  a raised altar with balustrade, plus a gallery at the back.  Otherwise a simple barrel vault, ornately carved, gilt, and with 50 or so square paintings of saints and patriarchs.  The optical effect is curious: because of its regularity, it assumes a kind of hypnotic power.  The floor too is marble.

The carving around the base of the main arch over the altar is beautiful: mermaids and cherubim.  Rich intricate forms and gilt under the gallery.  The supporting piers have carving which is fully three-dimensional: there is space between parts from the body of the stone.  The facade is very different too: porphyry and marble, with a large rose window.  Brilliant composition down the side of the church from the Ponte dei Miracoli: the pilasters line up hypnotically.  Another fine view from Piazza Santa Maria Nova.  It looks like a train, with its narrow, compact form.

What can one say about Santi Giovanni e Paolo?  Well, Lorenzetti tries to say it in densely-researched pages.  This church has more in it than most museums; you could spend three days, two weeks, just looking at everything here.

Santi Giovanni e Paolo is huge: I had forgotten the sheer impact of it.  I had vaguely remembered the monuments; but not this amazing density.  It is like a huge memorial to Venice's glorious past, placed in a Musée d'Orsay-type setting – a barn, a railway station, a huge Battersea Power station (but imagine turning Battersea Power station into Santi Giovanni e Paolo).  Someone has lit the apse; the altar is visible now; I think I prefer it dark, like Gesuati.  The monument on the right of the nave with the three statues is particularly striking.  As ever, I ask: how can I look and see and remember all this?  I can't, and so shall not try.  I shall walk round (note: Lorenzetti is organised as an anti-clockwise circuit), trying to find among the desperate richness of Lorenzetti things I see.  NB: this is like memoriousness: too much data, not enough info because these is no way to organise it on paper.  Perhaps hypertext is the answer, or an intelligent book, context sensitive.  At this level, a wise fellow traveller is necessary, perhaps.

Imagine how many years of Lorenzetti's life it took to write the book.  Note too there is no other guide like it: not for London, Paris, Rome etc.  Venice is unique.  Because of its size, you can walk it; because of its art, it is memorable; because of its uniqueness random wandering pays off: every step.  It is all so integrated and connected – links by culture as well as space (Lorenzetti says this in his intro): "a guide in time as well as place".  This is the book of his life as well as lifeline.  Compare Proust: his novel is a guide to his life – and to people as well as places, of Faubourg Saint-Germain, his Venetian nobility.

With all the monuments, the walls seem crawling with life.  The very simple design of the church is probably crucial, especially the pillars and windows (which are few).  The chapel of the rosary comes as a surprise: it is warm, there is the smell of incense.  It is also alive with sculpture, carving, painting.

I love the pay-as-you-go lighting systems in Italy: L.200 in a little box for five minutes or so.  It sums up memory and visiting these places so well: you always have a finite time – so what do you look at?  I always try to turn away before the light goes out: active rather than passive loss.  I have been here about 90 minutes; it is dark, very cold; I am less than half-way round the itinerary: Lorenzetti has defeated me.  I'm going home - well, "home".

It is 6 o'clock in Piazza San Marco; the campanile's two bells are a semitone apart and hang in the air like a gamelan.  It reminds me of one 6am two years ago.  And now they have stopped, and other more distant bells ring in answer.  Older, less pure. Like San Gimignano, Big Ben, Cambridge, church bells everywhere, to remind people, to commemorate.  Bells mark time – for example in music..."mortuos plango, vivos voco".

Lorenzetti beat me because of time: it was dark and I was barely half-way round his itinerary.  Lorenzetti does not work in the dark: you need the long views.  Venice at night is not the same city – you would need another Lorenzetti.  I was also beaten by the trump card of Santi Giovanni e Paolo; I was not prepared for the sheer richness of its holdings.  I found myself in a black hole of culture: its massiveness and attractiveness were too great.

But like all such failures, it is also a victory.  A victory in that I have gained the knowledge that Santi Giovanni e Paolo is far richer than I imagined; that Lorenzetti is not to be taken so lightly.  Next time I will be better prepared.  And this is part of the attraction of Venice: the next time, the sense that your memories of now and the past will contribute further.  It is when there is nothing to look forward to, no further richness, that ennui sets in.

I am sitting now just by the Sotoportego e Corte de Ca' dei Riva; I am probably in the corte part.  From my table, I can see Florian across the way.  People walk across my view like fish in an aquarium.  Like fish, they glance in at me.  They remind me of Bede's bird winging its way through the hall.  They cannot resist looking in; and when they meet my stare, they quickly turn away.  People move past the confined space like characters in a strip cartoon – snapshots.

Going out the long way to the station.  It is much further than I remembered.  Near the station, the shops get tawdrier and tackier.  The station is not just a railhead, but a beachhead of the outside world; here everything modern seeps in.  The station itself is surreal: this unadorned slab of light, with the huge waste of space in front.  It looks like the aliens have landed.  And opposite, San Simeone Piccolo, my first sight of Venice.  Along the way, half-remembered sights, plus lots that were completely strange.  It is a different world beyond Santi Apostoli.

The way across the bridge is strangely disconcerting: the streets are narrow, poorly signposted, and unattractive.  There are no churches, no campi, not even canals; you wonder if you have made a mistake.  Again, the feeling of disjunction.  There are trees in Campo San Giacomo dell'Orio.  I have never been there before.

Now I stand under what looks like the market: colonnaded and arcaded, opposite where I looked yesterday.  Totally devoid of people; certain parts of the city are a ghost town.  I am directly opposite my little calle: I can see people crossing along the Strada Nova.  Opposite me, down the whole stretch of the canal, there are probably just 20 windows lit up; who lives in these palaces?  And what happens in the rest of them? 

From the Rialto I took No. 1 vaporetto.  This is how the Grand Canal should be seen: from the water, at night.  It is quiet, there is practically no other traffic; and the palazzi brood gloriously.  In fact, Lorenzetti puts this as the last main itinerary, rightly so: as you pass along, you can see all the little campi and fondamenti along the canal, and can join them together with a different thread.  Ideally one day you would join up all the bridges by travelling through the rii.  But there is an irony: Lorenzetti's itineraries are predominantly about walking; only Jesus could walk the last itinerary.  For the rest of us, the speed of the boat becomes another apt symbol of how experience rushes by us with little time to take it in. 

Passing by Santa Maria della Salute, it is clear that this is a total masterpiece, a kind of Venetian Taj Mahal.  At night, the orecchioni seem to flow down, and there is a veritable forest of statues up there (50, perhaps?).  San Giorgio Maggiore palely lit up across the water.

4.1.88 Venice

A quick glance at San Marco.  Again the richness, but especially the sense of time.  In its darkness and design, this moment could be 1000 years ago.  Looking at some of the friezes in the cupola, I thought: each of these has a meaning and intent: is it possible to know them all?  He – Lorenzetti - did…

On the Lorenzetti trail.  From San Marco to San Zulian (what a good Venetian name).  The facade is rather odd, with windows in the pediment, and a large commemorative slab in the face.  Also inscriptions in Greek and Hebrew.  Then on round the back streets to Santa Maria Formosa.  This is definitely mine.  The Querini-Stampa gallery is closed (again).  It is very cold today: I can barely hold my pen; but the sky is beautifully clear.  

It is so cold I have had to return to the hotel to write.  It is strange how I can bring back with me the images: the last monument on Lorenzetti's itinerary was, aptly enough, San Lorenzo – still unrepaired since World War I.  It has a fine brick facade, and is set behind its own deep square, leading to the canal – one of the long straight ones which cuts through from north to south. It is quite foggy now; it will be fascinating to see Venice under this aspect.  Very "Don't Look Now"...

I follow Lorenzetti's back-routes to San Francesco della Vigna.  An absolute warren, poor but interesting.  The facade is familiar – not from before, but because it has a characteristic Palladian design of two pediments, one piercing the other.  It is massive and impressive. The interior is rather four-square – the same grey and white as Santa Maria della Salute.  It is quite light, and packed with minor art, according to Lorenzetti.  

Back to Santa Maria Formosa.  The facade facing the campo is, like its name, very full and flowing.  Inside is simple, and looks typically 17th/18th century, rather than older.  It seems a living parish church.  I walk to the Accademia, and then round and round; I am cold and exhausted.  However, I did come across the Locandia Stefania near San Tolentini – which I am pretty sure is where I stayed my second time in Venice.  It cost me L.10,000, I recall.  I also remember the green-blue colouring of the walls, the central hall – very cold, and my very small room, barely a cupboard.

I was looking for somewhere to eat; there was a place near to the locanda, but unspecial.  I probably should have taken it.  My wanderings finally brought me back to the Accademia, and then beyond (to the Peggy Guggenheim gallery), where I have found a trattoria of sorts.  Venice is defeating me: although being here is an amazing experience, I cannot take too much of it.  I am still not sure that I have taken it in – that I am here.  I look from the Accademia bridge, at the sights, but it is like an image, not my reality.  I think I will have to leave writing about it for a while.

I must own up to doing something rash: I spent L.300,000 on a print.  I hope this is another small victory.  Not just any print, of course: Canaletto's view of Santa Maria Formosa, engraved by one Visentini: second edition, sometime around 1800.  It is an interesting object: a second pull of an image engraved from a drawing of a sight 200 years ago.  And now it will grace my world as one of my artefacts.

Correr Museum – Venice's image of itself, and a unique view on to Piazza San Marco.  There is a picture from around 1650 which shows Venice almost identical to today.  Crazy image by Antonio Canova: it is called "Ritratto di Amedeo Svayer". He looks about 30 stone, and has what seems to be a skinned rat on his  shoulder.  A roomful of lions of St. Mark.  The library: a fine high room.  A roomful of apprehensive-looking Doges.  With their wigs and hats they look like sheep.  A roomful of coins.  After roomfuls of third-rate Madonnas, it is a relief to get to the cases of Urbino maiolica – very peaceful colours. Then a slow cappuccino, plus an equally slow read of "La Stampa", still my favourite Italian newspaper.

Leaving Venice is easier than you might think – if only because it is a place where you always intend to return to.  Therefore nothing feels closed off, finished.  All those things you meant to do, you can do next time.  Thus this time I failed in a number of respects: I never finished yesterday's Lorenzetti itinerary; or visited San Giorgio Maggiore; or San Michele.  It does not matter.  

Disgusting as it is, I love the smell of Venice.  When you leave a hotel or gallery, it hits you and says: "it's me".  The fog has lifted slightly; as the light fades, it acquires a blue hue as my eyes have been corrupted by the yellow lamps in the hotel.  Outside, I can see a small rio with covered gondolas.

The mist and the night: perhaps the kindest way to leave it; just like the lights going off in the churches.  The city sinks into darkness as if into its waters – as one day, millennia hence, it will indeed do.  Thereafter, it will exist only as a memory, like Atlantis.

Walks with Lorenzetti

More destinations: